[gov_bean_ counter]

Here you go DA. This is the part you don't know so all your other cut and paste crap isn't worth a tinker's damn.

Sec. 39.52.250. Advice to former public officers.

(a) A former public officer may request, in writing, an opinion from the attorney general interpreting this chapter. The attorney general shall give advice in accordance with AS 39.52.240(a) or (b) and publish opinions in accordance with AS 39.52.240(h).

(b) A former public officer is not liable under this chapter for any action carried out in accordance with the advice of the attorney general issued under this section, if the public officer fully disclosed all relevant facts reasonably necessary to the issuance of the advice.

[wtc911]

Sorry sparky but the items you posted depend upon the submission of acceptable proof that the actions that precipitated the filing of a complaint of an alleged violation were...

"carried out in accordance with the advice of the attorney general issued under this section, if the public officer fully disclosed all relevant facts reasonably necessary to the issuance of the advice."

I'll translate that for you...

Unless any action can be proven to have been first authorized by the advice of the AG (after full disclosure) then there is no suspension here of liability.