Palin's Team Urges Big Crowds at The Undefeated

US News and World Report ^ | July 5, 2011 | Paul Bedard

[2ndDivisionVet]

Big crowds are being urged to flood the openings of The Undefeated, the movie about former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's political rise, the latest indication that the 2008 vice presidential nominee is still looking for a signal from the public that it wants her to run for president.

In a blast email, "Team Sarah" asked supporters to start buying tickets to premiers in cities like Indianapolis, Orlando and Phoenix. "You can be the spark that becomes a grassroots revolution helping to ignite, solidify, inform, and unify Americans around the values that Sarah Palin represents, and, frankly, it isn't that terribly hard!," said the email. "Team Sarah wants to see "The Undefeated" become a BIG success and we are treating this like OPENING DAY in a long battle to promote the VALUES we see that Sarah Palin represents! But, we need to ACT! Please don't waste time."

Palin has been showing the movie in Iowa and a few other places, but supporters feel that having a successful opening will prove that she remains politically relevant and influence her decision to run for the White House.

A message to all members of Team Sarah:

Team,

You can be the spark that becomes a grassroots revolution helping to ignite, solidify, inform, and unify Americans around the values that Sarah Palin represents, and, frankly, it isn't that terribly hard!.

Team Sarah wants to see The Undefeated become a BIG success and we are treating this like OPENING DAY in a long battle to promote the VALUES we see that Sarah Palin represents!

But, we need to ACT!

Please don't waste time.

Click on the link below and start purchasing your tickets for Opening Weekend July 15, 16, and 17:

We need to SELL OUT the evening shows on July 15th and 16th if you BELIEVE IN THE MESSAGING and VALUES OF THIS FILM. if you believe in Sarah Palin and the values she represents in the country today, now is YOUR CHANCE to stand up and make a HUGE IMPACT with what amounts to only a little effort.

The Undefeated needs strong attendance to roll out across the country in subsequent weeks. Your fellow Americans DESERVE to see this movie just like you did. Strong attendance, we believe, will also send a strong message to the liberal media elites and their political cronies- that Americans are hungry for REAL leaders who can navigate tough storms instead of sound-biting their way along to pander for votes or media support.

As one of Sarah Palin's supporters, only YOU can help make this happen!!!

Watch what Gov. Palin Says about the film.

Together we can make this happen, and it starts by getting people in to see this movie. Please click on the link now and purchase your first chunk of tickets to take family, friends, co-workers and others to see the movie July 15, 16, and 17.

Encourage other Sarah Palin supporters to purchase a minimum of 5 tickets to the first nights Friday evening performances.

Team Sarah Groups for The Undefeated

If you can commit to reserving 5 seats for The Undefeated on the OPENING NIGHT in one of the 10 first cities, JOIN the appropriate group and post a message there letting others know that you will be coming and bringing 4 friends!

ARIZONA

Phoenix AZ

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedphoenixaz

CALIFORNIA

Orange CA

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedorangeca

COLORADO

Highland Ranch CO

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedhighlandsranchco

FLORIDA

Orlando FL

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedorlandofl

GEORGIA

Kennesaw GA

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedkennesawga

INDIANA

Indianapolis IN

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedindianapolisin

MISSOURI

Impendence MO

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedindependencemo

OKLAHOMA

Oklahoma City OK

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedoklahomacityok

TEXAS

Grapevine TX

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedgrapevinetx

Houston TX

http://teamsarah.ning.com/group/theundefeatedhoustontx

Thanks for ALL you do!

The Tiny Team Behind the Team!

Visit Team Sarah at: http://teamsarah.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

[wtc911]

I am deeply flattered that you read my posts closely enough to quote them.

[Springfield Reformer]

I never said the law will not be applied, only that it will be applied in context, which does not include your fanciful notion of indefinite liability under the AK Ethics Act. Please stop misrepresenting my position.

And I’m sorry if you don’t get that the burden of proof is on you, but it is. You are the one who came in here reading a statute out of context and proposing a kind of liability which makes no rational sense and for which you cannot or will not offer proof that it exists in the real practice of law, and we are supposed to accept on faith that this wild invention of yours is valid law?

If it is real, why can you not find just one case with which to shut me up? I’m really not asking for much. Just one case ….

waiting ..... waiting .... holding my breath now …..

[kevkrom]

I am deeply flattered that you read my posts closely enough to quote them.

Actually, I'm quite enjoying the smackdown you're getting from Springfield Reformer. Pointing out your own hypocrisy is just my minor contribution to the show.

[Springfield Reformer]

AS 39.52.910. Applicability.

(a) Except as specifically provided, this chapter applies to all public officers within executive-branch agencies, including members of boards or commissions. This chapter does not apply to

(1) a former public officer of an executive-branch agency unless a provision specifically states that it so applies;

(2) legislators covered by AS 24.60; or

(3) the University of Alaska and an employee of the University of Alaska as to activities or employment under a contract between the employee and the university described in AS 14.40.210 (a)(4).

(b) The provisions of this chapter supersede the common law on conflicts of interests that may apply to a public officer of an executive-branch agency and any personnel rules relating to conflicts of interests, excluding nepotism, adopted under AS 39.25. However, nothing in this chapter precludes a prosecution under an applicable criminal statute nor prevents enforcement of any other state law that imposes a stricter standard of ethical conduct on public officers.

(c) The provisions of this chapter are not subject to negotiation by collective bargaining under AS 23.40.

(d) Nothing in this chapter

(1) supersedes AS 39.90.020 [see below**]; or

(2) precludes an immediate family member of a public employee from employment in the same agency or administrative unit as that public employee, so long as the public employee does not have authority to take or withhold official action affecting the terms or conditions of the immediate family member’s employment in a manner that violates state law.

**AS 39.90.020. Nepotism Prohibited.
It is unlawful for a person who is the spouse of or is related by blood within and including the second degree of kindred to the executive head of a principal state department or agency to be employed in that department or agency.

[Springfield Reformer]

I am glad you are enjoying the show. :)

[Deb]

You guys are adorable.

[Springfield Reformer]

I am also puzzled that you don’t seem to recognize the value in a name trademark from a defamation point of view. Palin, and rightly so, has no vested interest in financing those who would defame her by using her name in defamatory contexts. But as a public figure, she is hobbled on direct defamation claims. However, when her rights in her name are violated by her detractors, although their aim may be defamation, she now has a cause of action to use as an incentive to stop the defamation. Famous people do that, and it is smart, and is no predictor of pecuniary motive. It only shows that a person has an interest in protecting their own good name and reputation. For evidence of other, more sinister motives, you would need a crystal ball.

[Deb]

You’re a liar. Its a documentary, dumbass. There are no “writing” credits. It was inspired by her book. Which she wrote. She had nothing to do with the production of the movie.

[wtc911]

A lawyer, who has the time to spend on the internet during working hours, says...

"This is my theory. It contradicts the written law. I can't prove it with precedence, so it's up to you to prove me wrong."

This impresses you? Well, I guess it would.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Mail.

[wtc911]

You’re a liar. Its a documentary, dumbass. There are no “writing” credits....

________________________________

Gee but you're classy, aren't you?

You are also wrong...all documentaries are written by somebody.

This particular one has two writers credited...Steve Bannon and Sarah Palin(™).

Keep it classy Deb, you are an inspiration to us all.

[wtc911]

Trademark the name strictly as protection against defamatory comments...just like Reagan, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and countless other politicians did.

[Deb]

I don't need a lecture on class from a liar. Or a lecture on docs. The narrations are written (obviously) and the "clip list" is written (I know, I've done a few), but if Sarah was credited, it was for her book which was the inspiration for the film.

You'll have to provide a link to anything that shows her as the "writer". And save your lectures. Or cram them...whatever.

[wtc911]

You know very well that you are asking for negative proof. It may impress some of the freepers but you and I and others fully understand your effort to deflect.

The law is clear in its wording. It was enacted 12 years ago. There have been only two former governors in that time.

You want freepers to believe that since there have been no ethics complaints filed against those two ex-governors after they left office that the law is without meaning.

You can't prove it and you know it. So you seek back-handed negation.

Is this how you practice, by making un-supported claims then demanding that they be dis-proved or else they must be accepted as truth? Is that really the way you operate?

Don't worry...you will impress a few here...not me but a few.

[wtc911]

You've "done a few" but still state that "documentaries have no writing credits"?????

You need more than a lecture on class...you need one on honesty.

Have a nice day Deb.

[HalfFull]

I can only think of only one reason why so many “conservatives” hate Palin so much they jump on every Palin thread, and throw out their crap....care to guess?

[trisham]

Please Click the Pic

[Deb]

The Falcon Party?

[Deb]

I didn’t say docs have no writing credits. I said Sarah did not write “Undefeated” and has no writing credit. Post a link. You are still a liar. And a dumbass.

[HalfFull]

Many hate her because she is an unashamed Evangelical Christian. The hate includes many (not saying all) Atheists, Catholics and Jews