Posted on 06/28/2011 4:59:39 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
A new statewide survey in Alaska shows President Obama beating Sarah Palin in her home state in a head-to-head matchup. Continue Reading
The poll, by Hayes Research Group, had a sample size of 500 likely voters and a 4.4-point margin-of-error.
Still, it showed Obama's support as stronger than Palin's in a horserace.
Some 34 percent said they felt "strong" in backing Obama, while 6 percent were "not so strong," and 2 percent were undecided but leaning toward him.
Palin, Alaska's former governor and the Republican vice presidential nominee in 2008, had 25 percent of likely voters saying they felt "strong" about supporting her, while 6 percent were "not so strong," and 5 percent were unsure but leaning toward her.
Still, there were a large number of undecided voters in the survey, with 7 percent saying they'd support another candidate, and 16 percent saying they remained undecided.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
You ought to be trashed for saying that. Either that, or ridiculed.
Like Mark Levin said, even an orange juice can can beat Obama in 2012.
500 likely voters? Hell, pick a town of eskimos living off food stamps and see what kind of response you'd get..........
Yeah. If you want your Murky money or some such.
Mosquito Power could be harnessed there as a new form of energy.
Alaska has always been a welfare state.
So who can beat BO? McCain nearly beat BO and most people only voted for him because of Palin. Without McCain she will probably do better.
I would have to ask, what has changed since a REAL poll in 2008?
McCain and Palin spanked the O team 192,631 to 122,485.
That’s in the neighborhood of 59% to 37% win.
The leopards think they have been able to change their spots".
Yep...you are another ash carrying trash...
Some here will believe any poll as long as long as it’s against SARAH. And coming from Politico no less! LOL!
Look at our state, conservatives vastly outnumber the left here. I hear people all the time longing for the good ole days when Palin ran the show. Alaskans felt good about their state govt back then, no joke.
Palin had a 93% approval rating, an 89% approval rating, and sustained approval ratings in the 80s.
I think that during a campaign, Palin will carry Alaska.
For comparison’s sake, Bush won the state 61-36. Considering McCain got 46% of the popular vote compared to Bush’s 51, Alaska was one of the states that went more red than 2004, being R+10 in 2006 and R+14 in 2008 by the Cook PVI standard.
BINGO! But some here can’t think nor see what is obvious to most. So much for rnright.
I agree, we will get wiped out with her as the nominee.
Joe Miller also had the distinction of being a horrible candidate all by himself. I like Miller, but he made so many gaffes that he simply could not overcome.
For one, the establishment controls politics in Alaska. That’s just the way it is. Occasionally an insurgent can win, but there is a reason Alaska generally has long-serving Senators and Reps. despite being so young as a state. The only way this can be overcome is by an effective campaign, which Palin has proven herself more than capable of running.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.