Skip to comments.
Poll: Obama beating Palin in Alaska
Politico ^
| 6/28/2011
Posted on 06/28/2011 4:59:39 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: RockinRight
I get trashed for saying it, but Palin cannot beat Obama. You ought to be trashed for saying that. Either that, or ridiculed.
Like Mark Levin said, even an orange juice can can beat Obama in 2012.
41
posted on
06/28/2011 5:21:19 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Republican Wildcat
or is this poll completely out of line with reality?
500 likely voters? Hell, pick a town of eskimos living off food stamps and see what kind of response you'd get..........
To: Republican Wildcat
Yeah. If you want your Murky money or some such.
43
posted on
06/28/2011 5:21:59 PM PDT
by
RedwM
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Mosquito Power could be harnessed there as a new form of energy.
44
posted on
06/28/2011 5:24:31 PM PDT
by
screaminsunshine
(Socialism...Easier said than done.)
To: Mygirlsmom
"If that is true the MSM will start championing her to be the nominee, right?"
Why? That would be like a kiss of death to a GOP Primary candidate. It would be like the affect a Rush Limbaugh endorsement would have in the Democrat's Primary.
45
posted on
06/28/2011 5:24:34 PM PDT
by
rob777
To: screaminsunshine
Alaska has always been a welfare state.
To: RockinRight
So who can beat BO? McCain nearly beat BO and most people only voted for him because of Palin. Without McCain she will probably do better.
47
posted on
06/28/2011 5:32:04 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Republican Wildcat
I would have to ask, what has changed since a REAL poll in 2008?
McCain and Palin spanked the O team 192,631 to 122,485.
That’s in the neighborhood of 59% to 37% win.
48
posted on
06/28/2011 5:32:30 PM PDT
by
labette
( Humble student of Thinkology)
To: Republican Wildcat
We have to remember that Politico is a liberal-dominated website designed to lure conservatives into thinking they are, somehow, offering unbiased info when the exact opposite is their real mission.
The leopards think they have been able to change their spots".
49
posted on
06/28/2011 5:33:36 PM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves for they shall never run out of material. c)
To: Mygirlsmom
Palin cannot beat Obama.
If that is true the MSM will start championing her to be the nominee, right?
Hehe -- bullseye!
To: Republican Wildcat
Politico=Journolist. Politico has no credibility anymore.
To: BuddhaBrown
Yep...you are another ash carrying trash...
To: dragonblustar
Some here will believe any poll as long as long as it’s against SARAH. And coming from Politico no less! LOL!
To: org.whodat
Pollsters in Ak are akin to dem operatives. Nobody up here has ever taken them seriously; can't figure why so many freepers get taken in so easily; laughable you simple simons. And I look at some of the freepers posting and ask myself how can that joker be so gullible. No wonder the halfrican won with all you guys voting for him, nutty????
Look at our state, conservatives vastly outnumber the left here. I hear people all the time longing for the good ole days when Palin ran the show. Alaskans felt good about their state govt back then, no joke.
54
posted on
06/28/2011 5:39:16 PM PDT
by
Eska
To: Republican Wildcat
Palin had a 93% approval rating, an 89% approval rating, and sustained approval ratings in the 80s.
I think that during a campaign, Palin will carry Alaska.
55
posted on
06/28/2011 5:39:41 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
To: labette
For comparison’s sake, Bush won the state 61-36. Considering McCain got 46% of the popular vote compared to Bush’s 51, Alaska was one of the states that went more red than 2004, being R+10 in 2006 and R+14 in 2008 by the Cook PVI standard.
To: Republican Wildcat
Alaskan is a welfare state. Every Alaskan receives around $7,000 per year from the oil companies.
Palin had a %88 favorable rating before her nomination as VP.
Then she was trashed and had to resign because of all the investigations.
Joe Miller lost his Senate race in 2010 because Palin endorsed him in Alaska. Murkowski then ran against Palin and Miller. People turned out to vote against "the Palin candidate".
Palin would not be able to win her home state much like Al Gore in 2000.
Palin fans don't want to hear this because they don't care about the future of the country. They just want to start a fanclub.
To: Mygirlsmom; RockinRight
BINGO! But some here can’t think nor see what is obvious to most. So much for rnright.
To: RockinRight
I agree, we will get wiped out with her as the nominee.
59
posted on
06/28/2011 5:45:46 PM PDT
by
DeusExMachina05
(I will not go into Dhimmitude quietly.)
To: Minus_The_Bear
Joe Miller also had the distinction of being a horrible candidate all by himself. I like Miller, but he made so many gaffes that he simply could not overcome.
For one, the establishment controls politics in Alaska. That’s just the way it is. Occasionally an insurgent can win, but there is a reason Alaska generally has long-serving Senators and Reps. despite being so young as a state. The only way this can be overcome is by an effective campaign, which Palin has proven herself more than capable of running.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson