Your statement was guilty until proven innocent with respect to Emily Good. Seems to me that you are engaging in guilty until proven innocent with respect to the officer. As I stated, you’re postion cuts both ways. Now do you understand?
I have already addressed that, but I'll do it again and type slower this time...
Everything said against the police officer's actions is on the video. An allegation that Ms. Good said something to provoke the officer is NOT on the video. YOU said that Ms Good needed to be proven innocent concerning that allegation and I pointed out that the burden of proof is on the officer, which obviously didn't happen since the DA dropped the charges. Ms. Good has no duty or obligation to prove her innocence.