Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
The law applies to Palin(TM) for as long as she lives.

If we accept, for the sake of argument, that your reading of the law is complete and correct (and I have no reason to doubt that you are correct), then wouldn't it make sense for Palin to amass a personal "warchest" to ensure that she can cover any related legal fees if she was going to actively run and invite such suits again?

169 posted on 06/28/2011 11:16:52 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
You are free to read the law yourself, as is any interested party, I cited it often enough.

The point is not that having to reply within twenty days to each accepted complaint would hurt her financially (although I'm sure that this would be a concern).

The point is that each filed complaint, whether accepted or not would become front-page, evening news, Sunday morning headlines.

Each new complaint would give the media the opportunity to resurrect all the old stuff (in the interest of context of course.

Further, each would give new life to the quit story since this was one of the reasons she gave for doing so.

It would be Swift Boat on steroids and would effectively derail a Palin(tm) campaign.

173 posted on 06/28/2011 11:23:41 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson