Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30
However, the Supreme court does recognize that the rights contained therein are not absolute. You cannot shout, ‘Fire’ in a movie theatre under the guise of free speech, and as one judge noted, the constitution is not so absolute a document that it functions as a suicide document.

. Nor is the right of the officer to make unlawful demands of a citizen absolute, as shown by the fact that the charges were dropped.

If this ever went to court, you will probably find that it was within a cop’s ability to ask her to back up so he can affect an arrestm even if she was filming on her property.

If this goes to court, it will be before a jury of citizens who will probably more inclined to put themselves in the place of the property owner. I doubt that many will sympathize with a police officer who, in the company of several other officers, felt so threatened by a woman on her own property who clearly was not a danger to him that he felt justified in ordering her into her home. Folks are starting to see the police as tools of Big Government, and they feel pushed around by Big Government. I wouldn't be so sure about the outcome.

173 posted on 06/27/2011 7:45:47 PM PDT by PalmettoMason (Blacks are not inferior, but it is racist to hold them to the same standards as everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: PalmettoMason

Most people would probably accept that the temporary restriction upon a citizen’s right in regards to having to keep one’s distance was just.


191 posted on 06/28/2011 12:17:17 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson