Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBeers

I suggested on a liberal board that the matter should be left to a vote of the people, rather than to politicians. I was attacked with statements about how marriage is not something “sacred” because of the current divorce rates, and that the people should not decide because if that were the case we would still have slavery and women would not be allowed to vote....Yes, the Titanic is sinking..


345 posted on 06/25/2011 4:28:47 PM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: Fu-fu2
was attacked with statements about how marriage is not something “sacred” because of the current divorce rates, and that the people should not decide because if that were the case we would still have slavery and women would not be allowed to vote...

There are many brainwashed useful idiots out there thanks to our government run education indoctrination system, these are arguments that those who elected the marxist often use when it comes to promoting homosexual sex as equal to heterosexual sex.

Here are my thoughts as to the arguments you encountered...

How does homosexual sex contribute to promoting the marriage institution that society values and has historically always valued? Suggesting that marriage is no longer sacred because of divorce rates so why not let homosexual sex be included as a premise for marriage would be like suggesting that high murder rates imply laws against murder are worthless and murders should be allowed in some cases.

Equating the legitimate discrimination of homosexual sex with slavery or voting rights is absurd unless those who choose to engage in homosexual sex are slaves or do not get to vote simply because they choose to engage in disordered sexual activity. Further, society does not value certain activities and as well legitimately discriminates against such activities for instance in who can donate blood.

Why should something that society has decided and science has proven is self destructive be accorded recognition, privilege, and reward?

The leftists claim it takes a village; however, in the case of homosexual marriage the facts are it would be a dead village after one generation. Promoting homosexual marriage is promoting death plain and simple. Such a death wish may be tolerated in a free society; however, a government that mandates and promotes such a death wish is a government that no longer promotes the common good

382 posted on 06/25/2011 8:47:44 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson