Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ina Hughs: Pro-life advocates should take responsibility
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | June 24, 2011 | Ina Hughes

Posted on 06/24/2011 3:17:52 AM PDT by don-o

I'm not pro-abortion. I'm pro-choice. For those who think ending a pregnancy is a crime, I hope life treats them well enough that it never becomes an issue. Any woman who'd never make that choice under any circumstance has my total support and respect. But it is not the government's right to assume control of any woman's reproduction rights. That is a private matter between her, her conscience, her own core beliefs and the people she wants to confide in.

Here's what I wish most of all: I wish there was as much passionate concern, the same raging commitment for unwanted children already here as there seems to be for the ones who might be.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: don-o

“I’m not pro-abortion. I’m pro-choice.”

Just another liberal playing semantics with words. Remember Liberals think children are “burdens”


21 posted on 06/24/2011 5:53:26 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
They also lack the mathematical reasoning skills to figure the odds of their being a slave rather than a ruler, in any such system. 100 losers to 1 winner?

It's not the math skills that they're lacking - it's the humility to even imagine that they might NOT be the winner.

22 posted on 06/24/2011 5:59:12 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Could be both ;-).


23 posted on 06/24/2011 6:03:35 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Yes, I woke up in a Grump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Thousands of couples desiring children to raise as their own and who cannot have children and this dumb bitch uses this excuse to justify murder in the womb?


24 posted on 06/24/2011 6:05:45 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

>>Here’s what I wish most of all: I wish there was as much passionate concern, the same raging commitment for unwanted children already here as there seems to be for the ones who might be.<<

Wife and I have and did: We adopted two boys at birth and were on our way to a third when my wife got pregnant the first time. After eight more pregnancies (two were miscarriages), we wound up with 8 boys and 1 girl in our family.

So don’t talk to me about “unwanted children” - there is no such thing, only unworthy parents.


25 posted on 06/24/2011 6:06:09 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


26 posted on 06/24/2011 6:12:55 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I'm not pro-abortion. I'm pro-choice.

Do ANY of them realize just how asinine that statement is?

If there's nothing wrong with abortion, why not be pro-abortion? And if there is something wrong with abortion, how can a person be in favor of allowing others to "choose" it? It's one or the other.

27 posted on 06/24/2011 6:17:24 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

The retread argument that it’s her body. Except it’s not - only half the DNA is hers. Obviously her body didn’t produce something with alien DNA without outside influence.

These things don’t happen spontaneously either. How about exercising a little self control? If you ain’t getting it, he ain’t getting it either.


28 posted on 06/24/2011 8:50:44 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

That would be (figurative) karma, but more likely she’d be celebrated as yet another pioneer and have so many lefties wanting to see her she would not have time for them all.


29 posted on 06/24/2011 9:05:01 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She paints the choice as being as devoid of important consequences as though one chose between blueberry pie or cherry pie.


30 posted on 06/24/2011 9:08:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
She paints the choice as being as devoid of important consequences as though one chose between blueberry pie or cherry pie.

Correct, it which case a person would be PRO-PIE.

If there is NOTHING WRONG with something, you would be pro whatever, not just in favor of choice.

31 posted on 06/24/2011 9:42:03 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: don-o
But it is not the government's right to assume control of any woman's reproduction rights.

But it is a function of government to prosecute those who deprive others of their basic right to life.

And, while I am at it, the government does not seek to control "women's reproductive rights". Even if we can get anti-abortion legislation passed and signed into law, no one will be inhibiting her right to choose whether she uses her reproductive organs.

She just won't get to play tin-god and decide who lives and dies based on convenience.

32 posted on 06/24/2011 9:55:40 AM PDT by delphirogatio (I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be wise as serpents and harmless as doves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Notice how all “pro-choicers” always talk about it’s not government’s role to interfere with women’s reproductive rights, but they are never pissed when government actively takes a side and funds abortions with taxpayer money? Like that isn’t promoting one side over the other? And then they bitch if government takes away funding for abortions?

If you don’t want government involved, why complain when government stops funding one side? What if all the money government spends for abortions shifted into adoption agencies? Would we see no complaints from “pro-choicers”?

Riiiiight.


33 posted on 06/24/2011 10:36:03 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Ugh, it grates me when people say “I’m not pro-abortion. I’m pro-choice.” You want abortion to exist ergo you’re pro-abortion! It isn’t that difficult to understand.


34 posted on 06/26/2011 12:53:57 PM PDT by scorpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson