Either way, because the War Powers Resolution does not include a definition of hostilities
Anybody else think this is Obamas “what is IS moment”? It seems every Dem has one....
The next argument he will have is that since we are using unmanned drones we are not really there.
(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;
(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat...
Reads pretty clear to me.
The war powers act does not include a definition of “is” either.