To: ansel12
No. But then the Palin supporters on here shouldn’t complain about Matthews giving positive coverage to Bachmann.
To be honest, a number of responses on this thread are delusional, talking about how Palin couldn’t select Bachmann as VP with no executive experience. My goodness, Michelle has her law degree, was a tax lawyer and has been in Congress now for a few terms. All while helping the 23 or whatever children. And Bachmann has no fear of any interviews or interviewers unlike Palin.
I’d say she probably has more depth of real experience than Palin frankly.
To: SteveAustin
WTH is a "real" experience.
Libtards are great at using words that are not quantifiable. Are you a libtard?
70 posted on
06/14/2011 7:41:23 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
To: SteveAustin
So you were just posting absolute fantasy nonsense, I’m glad you own up to it, but why post nonsense at all.
71 posted on
06/14/2011 7:42:58 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Bachmann/Rollins/Romney=destruction for Bachmann, but it sure helps Romney. WHY?)
To: SteveAustin
My goodness, Michelle has her law degree, was a tax lawyer and has been in Congress now for a few terms. All while helping the 23 or whatever children. And Bachmann has no fear of any interviews or interviewers unlike Palin.
With all due respect, none of that is executive experience.
Executive experience means management and taking the responsibility for results. Not theory, education, or policy.
Still, I would definitely go for Palin/Bachmann.
81 posted on
06/14/2011 8:51:12 PM PDT by
MV=PY
To: SteveAustin
Palin has a fear of interviewers? Honey, there’s a big difference between fear and choosing not to be used as a ratings draw by people who stab you in the back on a daily basis.
97 posted on
06/15/2011 3:35:52 AM PDT by
rintense
(The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson