Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
They have always had to share those profits with the State of Alaska. Palin just negotiated a better deal for her state to get a larger share of the profits.

You got a problem with that?

Who said I did?

119 posted on 06/13/2011 9:52:18 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
Some people seem to think that conserving the state's mineral resources and negotiating the best royalty agreement with the mining companies is something only a liberal would do.

The oil companies in Alaska had a sweetheart deal until they met up with Sarah Palin. She didn't take their campaign contribution bribes and she stood up for the people of her state.

I can't seem to fathom why so many Freepers think she did something wrong.

120 posted on 06/13/2011 10:01:36 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson