Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Media's Bias On Display In Hate Of Palin
IBD Editorial ^ | June 10, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 06/10/2011 6:03:22 PM PDT by Kaslin

'Journalism': The New York Times and Washington Post have asked their readers' help in scouring 24,000 emails from Sarah Palin's governorship, released Friday. They hate her — really hate her.

Imagine a newspaper in 2008 asking readers' help in perusing Barack Obama's emails as U.S. senator and Illinois state senator. Or for that matter, help in unearthing his college records. The howls from "mainstream" journalists and Democratic politicians would have been deafening.

But a private citizen conducting a bus tour across the country — Palin is not a candidate, let's not forget — is fair game for a mob witch hunt.

The Post told its readers "we're looking for some help ... to analyze, contextualize and research" Palin's emails, released after Freedom of Information Act requests, "right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release."

The paper asked for recruits for "100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the emails," open to anyone with an online computer.

As for the "Newspaper of Record," "Times reporters will be in Juneau, the state capital, to begin the process of reviewing the emails," the paper's "Caucus" blog said Thursday. "We're asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy emails, people and events that we may want to highlight." A "simple form" was provided to readers to do so.

The twin anti-Palin projects are telling in a number of ways — with other papers, like the Los Angeles Times and Britain's Guardian, catching their own cases of Palin email fever.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: palin; palinemails; sarahpalin; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Kaslin
The path of this nation is littered with feces droppings of the MSM and the tabloid press.
41 posted on 06/10/2011 7:22:05 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
This is the one candidate they fear more than anything else.

One more reason to back Palin...

42 posted on 06/10/2011 7:22:47 PM PDT by GOPJ (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act. - - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48

lol..can’t get her on the affair angle so might as well turn it into a divorce!


43 posted on 06/10/2011 7:22:53 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9
Maybe you should take a quick peek over at DU. They are literally begging her to run.

DU contains a collection of astoundingly stupid people, considerably more stupid than the norm. Duh -- they haven't figured out that Palin -- or just about anyone else, for that matter -- can and will kick Obama's ass, if indeed he is the Dem nominee in 2012, and I think there's a good chance he won't be.

And there are a few dumb folks on FR, as well, such as those who fall for the MSM illusion of Obama's manufactured "popularity."

On a related side note, I see on other threads that one of the MSM gambits to attack Palin is that she redacted zero, not even the personal contact info of the people who sent the emails. One hysterical blogsite I went to has liberals oozing with something ugly, accusing her of making it so Palin "nuts" can track down and take revenge on emailers who wrote critical emails. They think that she should have at least done something to protect the privacy of the emailers.

Had Palin done that, the MSM would be screaming, "Palin made redactions on virtually every email! What's she trying to hide?" And that would be that -- only on "right wing sites" would you find the factual information that, if it had happened this way, the redactions were ALL and ONLY in the nature of personal contact info. The same mindset that says "Palin quit!" would say, "Palin made redactions on every email!"

But apparently, Palin asked for zero redactions -- let it all hang out. Around Palin, the MSM is like a dumb dog on a short leash!

44 posted on 06/10/2011 7:27:22 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

At some future point, the history books will surely speak kindly of him.


45 posted on 06/10/2011 7:28:27 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

.


46 posted on 06/10/2011 7:29:15 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

“the St Petersberg Times”

The Palm Tree Pravda


47 posted on 06/10/2011 7:29:23 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Finny

“DU contains a collection of astoundingly stupid people, considerably more stupid than the norm. “

HEY!!! ;)


48 posted on 06/10/2011 7:29:55 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion
Shame on the “free press”.
Never apologize for putting scare quotes around "free" press. The press isn't free - the press is "associated." And that association functions as a borg.

49 posted on 06/10/2011 7:49:30 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They didn’t investigate Climategate like this....


50 posted on 06/10/2011 8:29:52 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
..."We're asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy emails, people and events that we may want to highlight."

Translation: Help us dig up and publicize dirt on Sarah Palin. Also, focusing on this helps us limit what we have to print about Weiner.

51 posted on 06/10/2011 8:42:58 PM PDT by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ
“Computer froze up.”

Didn't you mean to say you were hacked?

52 posted on 06/10/2011 8:47:46 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This will backfire, big time, on these LIEberal scumbags!

Run Sarah! Run!

Is it 2012 yet?


53 posted on 06/10/2011 8:53:33 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

I suggest we tell the Post and Times to either back off, or every Republican in the house will vote for a bill demanding full disclosure of all of Obama’s records, and demand a complete investigation of his fraudulent BC, etc.

My dog has more complete medical records than this imposter was willing to provide the American public!!!

Make Obama call off the attack dogs on one of our own, or we’ll respond in kind.


54 posted on 06/10/2011 8:54:54 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9; Bryan24
Maybe you should take a quick peek over at DU. They are literally begging her to run.

Yes, and they were all sure Wiener was telling the truth when he said he was hacked. The DUmmies believe anything the MSM tells them.

55 posted on 06/10/2011 8:56:02 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Obama worshiping media has their agenda.


56 posted on 06/10/2011 8:59:10 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I notice that most electronic communication with government officials who operate under so-called “sunshine” rules will give you the caveat that everything you send is open record, including your email address. Therefore, since the information was not private, it likely couldn’t be redacted under the rules. Keep that in mind when writing public figures, folks!


57 posted on 06/10/2011 9:00:29 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (They think "just because she's right on every damn issue doesn't give her enough credibility.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: I still care

In the wintertime when I’m in Florida I really like the St. Pete Times. I like the puzzles and the comics. The rest of it goes into the recycle bin! ;oD


58 posted on 06/10/2011 9:21:47 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope those LIEberal ‘Rat Bastards had to pay $1.00 per page!


59 posted on 06/10/2011 9:54:30 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

It has good coupons.

They could print up just the coupons and I’d be more likely to buy it for the same price. LOL.

Unfortunately, they usually have some sort of editorial headline on there dissing conservatives that ticks me off and I pass it by.


60 posted on 06/10/2011 11:52:59 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson