Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

HIS NEW BOOK

NY Times refused to review this book.

1 posted on 06/07/2011 12:00:04 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

COMMENT FROM THE ARTICLE:

This man, David Mamet, I knew as a college student for about three years in Vermont. We spoke, played fierce ping pong games and he was a person who I admired in many ways. I can still see him, in my mind’s eye; jogging on a path, very earlyin the morning in the cold dewy Vermont Spring with sweat pants and a tee shirt. I can remember him on his set of Waiting for Godot directing with great intensity, my roommate who was a member of his cast. His ego was never apparent and his clear eyes were never clouded with self promotion and above all, and most to his credit; he was a very solid man; a man without guile.

Over the years I have tracked his progress; it would have been impossible not to. And as someone who became more conservative as soon as I left the Peace Corps and began to enter the hard scrabble world of business I was a little disappointed that David was, seemingly, such a strong member of the liberal side of the political spectrum.

Over the past few years I have become quite distressed watching my beloved country rewarding so much bad behavior and tearing itself down even as the goodness of so many millions of Americans have been placed here and there for the benefit of those who are TRULY unfortunate in all corners of the world. We are a good sort of people; not perfect and not without fault but down deep, basically optomistic and good. This optomism has come from the deep well of free enterprise and from our Constitution
which gives us the right to feel good and fair.

So; with the changing of David Mamet I feel as though I am seeing the beginning of the turning of the tide and hope it is just in time to save our system and protect our place at the top of the world order as there are others, more hingry than we who are ready to grab the reins and who wilol be far, far less fair, ultruistic and kind than we have been.


2 posted on 06/07/2011 12:01:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Another great article about Mamet and his new book. Contains some hilarious Mametisms.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/converting-mamet_561048.html

3 posted on 06/07/2011 12:11:17 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
I certainly don't like every play David Mamet has written but I always admired his talent. I now admire his intellectual honesty and the courage to publicly profess that he realizes that leftist/liberal ideology is based on false premises and so, hopelessly flawed. Obviously, Mamet's artistic reputation will take a hit from the Manhattan/Malibu limousine liberal crowd but he probably very rich and his work will endure, even if Mamet doesn't get to see as many old friends, anymore.

NY Times refused to review this book.

Not surprised. Liberalism can't stand the truth, especially from one of their own. David Mamet is now an apostate (of the left) and will be shunned and ignored. Their loss.

4 posted on 06/07/2011 12:11:58 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Former lib, Hollywood insider; he’s a marked man, now.


8 posted on 06/07/2011 12:29:21 PM PDT by Baynative (Truth is treason in an empire of lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
John Maynard Keynes was twitted with changing his mind. He replied, "When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?

Too bad his modern day economic disciples don't consider changing their opinion to be an option.

9 posted on 06/07/2011 12:32:25 PM PDT by newheart (When does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

I’d love to know what Roger Ebert has to say about his one-time hero now!


10 posted on 06/07/2011 12:34:18 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

John Maynard Keynes was twitted with changing his mind. He replied, “When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?”

Tweeted this. Great quote.


11 posted on 06/07/2011 12:37:02 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (I am a US Citizen, A Patriot, A TEA Partier, An Oath Keeper, A Voter, An Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

*


12 posted on 06/07/2011 12:42:19 PM PDT by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

“Liberalism is a religion. It affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost. Central to this religion is the assertion that evil does not exist, all conflict being attributed to a lack of understanding between the opposed. Well and good, but this does not accord with the experience of anyone.”

“We cannot live without trade. A society can neither advance nor improve without excess of disposable income. This excess can only be amassed through the production of goods and services necessary or attractive to the mass. A financial system which allows this leads to inequality; one that does not leads to mass starvation.”

from David Mamet, The Secret Knowledge


14 posted on 06/07/2011 12:59:43 PM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

Thanks for the post. I’ve been hearing GREAT things about this book and am looking forward to reading it. If it’s as good as it’s purported to be, I’ll buy a few extra copies for liberal acquaintances who have previously revered Mamet.


15 posted on 06/07/2011 1:03:51 PM PDT by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Economics isn't as important a litmus test issue for conservatism as is social policy. Has this man turned pro life and anti homosexuality? Not that I care, especially. Just curious.

Also, his writing style is pompous and self indulgent. He still lectures like a liberal.

18 posted on 06/07/2011 1:22:58 PM PDT by Batrachian (Prepare for four more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
The argument in my play is between a president who is self-interested, corrupt, suborned, and realistic, and his leftish, lesbian, utopian-socialist speechwriter.

Just substitute "Secretary of State" for "speechwriter" and you have today's reality.

21 posted on 06/07/2011 1:55:28 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson