>> If you would like to argue islamic theology please do it offline.<<
Is that a demand?
Just wondering. If you are a mod or something, I understand this is private property of JR and he, and through his selected moderators, makes the rules of what is or isn’t in bounds.
So, is that from where you make this demand?
I will take a flyer that you aren’t a mod.
>>There are good muslim, and there are good people.<<
Ir is impossible to be a “good muslim.” That is like being a “good Satan worshipper.” It is an ideology based in evil, founded from evil, created by an evil person. Its entire purpose is to destroy all in its path (you may note that there has been not a single islamic invention in a thousand years).
The best one can be is a “stupid muslim” who does not understand the chains under which one labors.
If you would like to argue islamic theology please do it offline.
/// that is the whole entire point to the original article!
wearing that head covering, is them arguing their Islamic theology, instead of simply PLAYING SOCCER.
“FIFA also has strict rules against any religious
statements in team uniforms.”
(and, i certainly don’t hate Muslims either. many of them are good people, with families. i was (and am) personal friends with many of them.
i only hate Islam, which enslaves them, and endangers freedom all over the world.)
...again, they are chosing to violate FIFA rules, over something that is NOT mandatory in Islam.
allowing it, is akin to letting ONE religion pray in schools, and no others.
and, my #12, wasn’t arguing anything either.
that wasn’t my “opinion”.
everything there, can be documented.
including directly from Islam itself.
the ages, etc., come straight out of ahadith.
again, i don’t hate Muslims.
i have special compassion for the women.
but “compassion” for them, will never set them free.
THAT is my wish for them. that one day, they can be FREE of Islam.
FREEDOM to be more than the literal property of a man.