Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What say you?
1 posted on 06/05/2011 4:04:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

What did the other panelists have to say?


2 posted on 06/05/2011 4:07:01 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I say Chris Wallace’s opinion counts for very little.


3 posted on 06/05/2011 4:07:56 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wallace is a marxist, treasonist drip. Who the hell cares what his opinion is. I like the “you betchas”. They beat our current “you’ll do as I say” BS we’re putting up with!


5 posted on 06/05/2011 4:10:10 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She performed great and sounded like a candidate to me.


6 posted on 06/05/2011 4:12:10 PM PDT by Betis70 (Bruins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They’re playing checkers; she’s playing chess.


7 posted on 06/05/2011 4:14:10 PM PDT by pingman (Durn tootin'; I like Glock shootin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What say you?

I say: "Duh! Hello Chris...hello...". Chris is such a dullard.
10 posted on 06/05/2011 4:18:33 PM PDT by no dems (If the GOP nominee has no fire in the belly in 2012, we're going down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah did very well today!


12 posted on 06/05/2011 4:22:00 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah Louise Palin

Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI

Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama ISN'T!

72:1:12

13 posted on 06/05/2011 4:23:16 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think it would be wise to wait until she decides to run. People are getting way to carried away with Mrs. Palin when, up to this day, she hasn’t decided to be a candidate. She seems to be a very nice lady.


21 posted on 06/05/2011 4:33:12 PM PDT by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Chris Wallace being a true go getter in the MSM finally takes the bull by the tail and faces the situation like a man.


25 posted on 06/05/2011 4:44:26 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Note: To all those suffering from PDS, please do not read the following comments, as they may cause your head to explode.

In one question, Wallace said, “What would a President Palin do under those circumstances?”

She didn’t argue with the “President Palin” title, she just answered the question.

Anyone who thinks she’s not running is in for a rude awakening.


32 posted on 06/05/2011 4:52:55 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
My wife and I watched the interview, and we thought Chris Wallace was very fair and that Sarah Palin handled herself extremely well, almost perfectly. We both noticed the point, late in the interview, when Wallace appeared visibly impressed with one of Palin's answers. It wasn't a "gotcha" question, but Palin's answer drew a clear nod and a broad smile from Wallace. It was a knockout punch after a series of solid hooks and jabs, and it was clear at that moment that Palin had won his respect.

On a side note, there seems to be a tendency among some Freepers to condemn anyone who might be convinced to agree with us on anything. Since we were here first, anyone who disagreed with us in the past in therefore ineligible to be an ally in the future. If this had been the standard in years past, "real" Conservatives would have rejected that old Hollywood union organizer, Ronald Reagan.

38 posted on 06/05/2011 6:13:31 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah hasn’t changed.

Where was he in 2008?


41 posted on 06/05/2011 7:02:05 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. -- John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Of course is you’re Big Media, the discussion about Palin will concern trying to make her historically correct statement about Paul Revere warning the British into the BIG ISSUE!!! ...not the economy, jobs, education, energy, or foreign affairs. That they will ignore as much as possible.


45 posted on 06/05/2011 9:07:04 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nhris Wallace has woken up. Others will follow. But me thing is sure. Wallace and others in the LSM still think they can make or break any candidate.

With Sarah Palin, they are dead wrong. She doesn’t need them at all.She can win without the LSM behind her.Her popularity has increased despite ALL the LSM could do to her.

Yes, Sarah made a fine appearance in Wallace’s interview. But the real realization is simple.Wallace has realized that the LSM cannot stop her, if they have not after all they have done to kill her politically.

You betcha!


46 posted on 06/05/2011 10:34:32 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One additional thing I meant to add,Sarah Palin is not only sharp on the isses. She has driven the issues from her Facebook Page for more than two years. The Health Care debate is one example. Her initiatives with nomenclatures , now in standard use, such as “death panels”, reflects this fact.

Its nice that Wallace has awoken to the Sarah Palin who we conservatives all know so very much more comprehensively than Wallace does.In fact most in the media simply have been blind to her role in actually shaping the national debate on issues from her Facebook Page, against an administration and Lame Stream media that has billions to spend in convincing the US public on Obama’s initiatives. Its David vs Goliath, and Sarah has won that type of battle repeatedly over the last two years with comparatively miniscule resources, compared to her detractors.Imagine what would be happening if she had an even playing field.I have no hesitation in saying that America has evolved its own version of Britain’s Margaret Thatcher or Israel’s Golda Meyer.

Yes,Sarah Palin is not only sharp on the issues. She has created many of them.

So I do not buy the context of Wallace’s conclusion that *finally*she has become sharp on the issues. She always has been and has created many in the sphere of national debate. That puts her head and shoulders above anyone else running for the office in 2012. She arrived a long time ago, and people like Wallace just did not know it. Despite their self assumed sophistication, the LSM is way behind the learning curve on Sarah Palin, dumber than dirt.If anything Wallace has the courage to face that fact. I am not so sure others will but lets see. Sarah can have a very powerful transformative effect, a necessary quality for a President of the United States.


47 posted on 06/05/2011 11:10:09 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson