[urtax$@work]

Discovery process inches forward in the SSN# of Obama.

[freepersup]

Where are all the keyboard commnados that mock, scorn and insult Orly Taitz?

[Daisyjane69]

THAT’S where I know the name of that judge!

It sounded familiar, but I couldn’t think of why.

heh

[Kleon]

For those who never wondered about how Social Security Numbers are generated, the first three digits represent the state of the recipient's mailing address.

According to the Social Security website, "One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that."

[urtax$@work]

......Ping..........

[seton89]

It would be quite a fire drill for the dems if Jughead bows out for ‘12.

[freepersup]

snip

>>> That is a level that no other case challenging Obama's eligibility or birth certificate ever has reached. <<<

Read more: Obama critic coming closer to Social Security records? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=306873#ixzz1OJFUrwPG

[browniexyz]

Judge Royce Lamberth! FROM TEXAS!

[ebysan]

http://www.einvestigator.com/links/social_security_numbers.htm

List of Social Security Numbers for Each State
Follow is a list of social security numbers for each state. The listing is organized in ascending order based on the SSN prefix, with the corresponding issuing state listed.

(Chart will not post as printed) Please check it out!!

SSN Prefix / Issuing State

040-049 / Connecticut

[GlockLady]

Vote, Forward and share widely: ONLINE SURVEY: Who should the GOP run in 2012? - click here to vote: http://svy.mk/kZDbRz

[EDINVA]

I question that there will actually be any discovery in this case any time soon. Call me a spoil sport or after birther, whatever .. but the 2 Orders Judge Lamberth issued merely a) let Dr Taitz refile her complaint with redacted SS#s within 14 days, and b) invite the SS Director to file a dispositive motion within 30 days. .

The judge’s “Scheduling Order” does not set out a time frame for discovery as is typically contained within the Scheduling Order of a case that is moving forward. Dr Taitz can subpoena, call for depositions, or send out written discovery all she wants, but they would be objected to (successfully, I’d venture) until such time as the defendant’s dispositive motion, her opposition, and his reply are ruled on. That’s a good 2+ months out.

This endless misinterpreting of judges’ orders and misreporting on them has gotten on my last nerve.

[American Constitutionalist]

" U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery "

But, we have been told over and over and over again like a broken piano by the obotcyborgs that this issue and case was not going anywhere and there will never be any kind of " discovery " ....