[Still Thinking]

I believe you’ve explained your idea before to me, on threads where I was objecting to the potential registration nature of a training requirement. I like it. I don’t see why it would present a problem.

[frog in a pot]

Thank you for your #35 response. Please excuse me for not keeping track of our earlier correspondence.

I don’t see why it would present a problem.

We will probably never know; micro managing, control-freakish politicians render implementation of such a concept unlikely.

This has been an interesting thread. Young American males are now growing up with the risk of committing a punishable offense if they so much as draw a picture of a handgun or make a hand gesture resembling a handgun.

It seems inconceivable that so many folks would be willing to allow these same young men to carry in the community without training, for fear of infringing a 2dA right.

One can wonder if these same folks would also find recklessly shouting “Fire” in a crowded auditorium permissible, based on a 1stA right to free speech.