Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TruthConquers

Is it true that in Zimbabwe and Botswana there was no such apartheid against blacks by whites?


42 posted on 06/02/2011 10:55:37 PM PDT by Cronos (Palin, Cain, Jindal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

I can’t say I know enough to answer that truthfully.

I do believe that the blacks in Rhodesia had some issues, but I don’t remember the details.

So, I would rather not post something inaccurate.


45 posted on 06/02/2011 11:02:44 PM PDT by TruthConquers (.Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

I don’t think they had the same rigid system SA did, but the country was ruled by whites with most land owned by whites, so blacks lived as serfs from what I understand. One difference was probably that Rhodesians were British-descended, while many of the whites in SA were Dutch-descended. After winning the Boer War, Britain made sure not to alienate the losers; they needed them to keep the grip on the country.


51 posted on 06/03/2011 3:44:41 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson