Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2
true, the Spanish and the Portuguese were the first -- motivated by the need to outflank the hated Turks. They were there from 1492 in the Americas and 1495 in India (Vasco Da Gama reached the real target that Columbus missed!)

The French and English and Dutch only came along in the 1600s and the English and French only really made headway in the early 1700s.

183 posted on 06/08/2011 5:43:57 AM PDT by Cronos (Palin, Cain, Jindal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

The Turks would do business after Constantinople fell, but for a price; Europe was simply looking for way to bypass them, as you mention. It wasn’t until 1492 that the last Muslim bastion in Spain fell.

When you look at how Spain holds on in Morocco (cities along the coast, like Ceuta), I’m surprised that the whites in South Africa didn’t attempt something similar: stake a claim on land (preferably along the coast for security purposes), and live in a 100% white country rather than attempt to govern as 10% in a black country. Even the part of Morocco that Spain left (”Western Sahara”) is resisting Moroccan claims - they insist that Morocco flooded them with settlers to skew any balloting.


185 posted on 06/08/2011 3:17:16 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson