Cause, factually speaking, if he’s not the age of majority, he is a minor.
That makes him a kid.
He can still be a piece of... and a kid. The two don’t contradict each other.
The only one that is shown to have a gun was the other kid.
He may have been trying to rob the pharmacy, but he is still presumed to be innocent of having a weapon, unless you can show otherwise.
Liar, he was CLEARLY robbing the pharmacy.
but he is still presumed to be innocent of having a weapon, unless you can show otherwise.
First Oklahoma State law isn't based on what I can show. Second, he was part of an armed team of robbers and that is as good as being armed.
Finally, if the POS wasn't dead and had been caught he would have been tried as an adult which means that he wasn't a "kid". Trying to soften his image by calling him a "kid" is a ploy used by liberal failures.