Liar, he was CLEARLY robbing the pharmacy.
but he is still presumed to be innocent of having a weapon, unless you can show otherwise.
First Oklahoma State law isn't based on what I can show. Second, he was part of an armed team of robbers and that is as good as being armed.
Finally, if the POS wasn't dead and had been caught he would have been tried as an adult which means that he wasn't a "kid". Trying to soften his image by calling him a "kid" is a ploy used by liberal failures.
Again, regardless of what the kid was trying to do, the state attorney was quite clear.
You cannot kill somebody, under Oklahoma law, when they are no longer in position to harm you.
Robbery or not.
Them’s the law and the state attorney knows them.