[Prokopton]

The problem is that some of us have actually read the Constitution and the Founders thoughts and intent. So twisting it doesn’t work.

You can call it "twisting" if you want, but the interpretation of the Constitution by SCOTUS is the law of the land. Until you get on the Supreme Court, your interpretation, even though I know you are a legend in your own mind, isn't worth a warm bucket of spit

[little jeremiah]

I thought we were discussing constitutionality. But what you apparently meant was supporting unconstitutional SCOTUS decisions if they suit your fancy.

Got it.

[DJ MacWoW]

but the interpretation of the Constitution by SCOTUS is the law of the land.

That doesn't mean that they and their agenda are correct, does it. And they should get away with destroying the Constitution because YOU agree with them? I think not.

I know you are a legend in your own mind, isn't worth a warm bucket of spit

More insults. Can't defend your POV without them? Think it will discourage those that disagree with you? Insults are a sign that you have no faith in what you're spouting and are trying to drive away disagreement. Either your opinions are worthy of defending or they are not. You seem to believe they are not.

[vox_freedom]

So, in your view, everything the Supreme Court decides is to be considered Constitutional?

How about abortion?

And do you think the killing of Terri Schiavo was Constitutional?