[DJ MacWoW]

but the interpretation of the Constitution by SCOTUS is the law of the land.

That doesn't mean that they and their agenda are correct, does it. And they should get away with destroying the Constitution because YOU agree with them? I think not.

I know you are a legend in your own mind, isn't worth a warm bucket of spit

More insults. Can't defend your POV without them? Think it will discourage those that disagree with you? Insults are a sign that you have no faith in what you're spouting and are trying to drive away disagreement. Either your opinions are worthy of defending or they are not. You seem to believe they are not.

[trisham]

More insults. Can't defend your POV without them? Think it will discourage those that disagree with you? Insults are a sign that you have no faith in what you're spouting and are trying to drive away disagreement. Either your opinions are worthy of defending or they are not. You seem to believe they are not.

**************************************

Well said.

[Prokopton]

And they should get away with destroying the Constitution because YOU agree with them?

Oh no. We should all follow what you think and totally disregard the Supreme Court. After all, you have demonstrated your deep knowledge of Constitutional history right here on this thread. Yeah, that's the ticket, ignore the Supreme Court because of some anonymous poster on a web forum.

Grow up.