Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

To be fair, he did not say “gay rights,” he said “rights for gays.” In fact, he said “rights for women, rights for gays.”

It may seem a small distinction, but it’s actually important.

In Muslim ruled countries, homosexuals have no rights at all and are often killed. If you take his words in context and by definition, it sounds like he was stating that homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else.

This is a HUGE contrast to “gay rights,” which means changed “rights” based on homosexual preference, and includes “more rights” such as “homosexual marriage.”

It seemed like a calculated play to get the 1 or 2 homosexuals who may hear that and decide to support him without committing himself to extra “rights” for the homosexuals.


595 posted on 05/23/2011 8:11:09 PM PDT by HushTX (I make libs rage quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]


To: HushTX

Thanks for your explanation.


614 posted on 05/23/2011 8:16:28 PM PDT by Spunky (Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]

To: HushTX

No problem if adults choose the homosexual lifestyle - just stop recruiting & exploiting our children and trying to mainstream the vile lifestyle!!!!

“Teachers, leave them kids alone!” (Robin of Berkeley)

http://www.robinofberkeley.com/2011/05/19/teachers-leave-them-kids-alone/


728 posted on 05/24/2011 4:55:53 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/West 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson