Incorrect. She saw lots of letters, just no anthrax letter because there was no anthrax letter sent to AMI. For example, there was no anthrax contamination of her trash can, no anthrax contamination of garbage bags, and no anthrax contaminiation of the garbage trucks that serviced AMI.
The lack of refuse-contamination is a fact. The fact means that an anthrax letter was never thrown away. Since no anthrax letter was ever found at AMI, another fact, the combination of those two facts means that no anthrax letter was ever sent to AMI.
The combination of those 3 facts above means that AMI was contaminated via a non-postal method.
Incorrect. She saw lots of letters, just no anthrax letter because there was no anthrax letter sent to AMI.
You're using absurd logic. You're saying there was no letter because you do not believe there was a letter.
Stephanie Dailey SAW the letter. She testified that she SAW the letter. She SAW THE POWDER in the letter. She testified that she threw it in the trash basket. She was interviewed by the media about it. The area around her desk was thoroughly contaminated. She tested positive for exposure to anthrax spores. (They FOUND spores in her nostrils.)
Claiming that it wasn't anthrax because she didn't perform tests on it to determine that it was anthrax is ABSURD. She was a secretary in an office, not a microbiologist in a laboratory.
If they didn't find any spores in her waste basket, it would be because she had a plastic bag lining the basket (as is the case in most offices), and the spores that didn't spill onto the carpet went into the plastic bag.
The plastic bag gets picked up by the cleaning crew, and they carried out to the dumpster. Spores inside the plastic bag can't escape into the dumpster or into garbage trucks.
Your "non-postal method" is total nonsense. It took at least a teaspoon of powder to contaminate the building and all the post offices en route to AMI.
Your "non-postal method" cannot explain how that much powder got into the AMI building, the post offices and everywhere else along the way. Your "non-postal method" is preposterous. There doesn't seem to be anyone else in the world who believes such nonsense. It's absurd.