Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2011 3:18:44 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Nachum

This mountain could turn into a mohel.


2 posted on 05/18/2011 3:21:54 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

So religiously observant Jewish families will have it done outside of San Francisco, as well as those who believe it better for health reasons.


3 posted on 05/18/2011 3:22:25 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .

The word Bris means covenant; the word Milah, to cut. Ritual circumcision is the covenant G-d has established with the Jewish people through the commandment of circumcision.

The big government libs in SF have no authority to regulate this personal choice. What happened to the "right to privacy" that they created, or is it like all other lib creations and only applies selectively when the arbiters of political correctness decide to play that card?

4 posted on 05/18/2011 3:23:17 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

All your foreskins are belong to us.


5 posted on 05/18/2011 3:30:52 PM PDT by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Yep. There is an issue that needs to be addressed by local government.

Sorry, cant do much about the homeless craping in the street...


6 posted on 05/18/2011 3:31:11 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
...what was until now a private family matter: male circumcision.

Not necessarily. I have known two doctors that are adamantly against it and will counsel young parents accordingly and even more doctors that are for it and will counsel young parents accordingly, even more aggressively, which very effectively removes it from the "private family matter" arena.

Personally, I think it should be an individual decision, and since the poor kid is too young to make the decision, then, well, they'll just have to wait until he's old enough before they go removing a very sensitive portion of his anatomy.

I'm not cut. Don't want to be cut. See no reason to be cut and have never had a hygiene problem, which is the first thing most advocates throw out there. My mama and daddy taught me how to use a wash cloth and soap and none of my wives have died from cervical cancer because I wasn't circumcised, nor any of my mistresses. (All "0" of them.)

But...to each his own.

(Yes, there is a certain amount of sarcasm there, but I see no good reason to perform a circumcision on a child that has no idea as to why it was done and for which there is no good reason given.)

8 posted on 05/18/2011 3:33:25 PM PDT by OldSmaj (I am an avowed enemy of islam and obama is a damned fool and traitor. Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Practioners who perfom circumcisions claim that the pay is lousy, but the tips are great.


9 posted on 05/18/2011 3:34:32 PM PDT by Former War Criminal (My senior Senator [who served in Vietnam and Rhode Island] said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
It's OK to dismember your babies down at the Planned Murderhood mill up until he actually makes it to birth, but then right after that it's a crime to do minr surgery that has known health benefits.

Everything in San Francisco makes so much sense.

10 posted on 05/18/2011 3:34:32 PM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Next they will want to conduct inspections to make sure that boys are in compliance. There will a new public employee union, Pecker Checkers International Union. There will be plenty of job applicants.


12 posted on 05/18/2011 3:35:39 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2000/07/37479

Does Circumcision Prevent AIDS?

Dumdeeedumdumdum....


13 posted on 05/18/2011 3:35:53 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Why attack circumcision?
Will the prepuce Nazi ban pierced ears or pierced tongues?
Could this ban having anything to do with the hatred that
the leftists, socialist, commies have towards God?
Why don’t they ban anal intercourse in San Francisco?
That practice is much more nasty and deadly than snipping
off loose skin.
God will deal with these people in due time and that
will be worth seeing! I’ve got ring side seats!


17 posted on 05/18/2011 3:40:37 PM PDT by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

San Francisco should be circumcised from the U.S.A.


22 posted on 05/18/2011 3:48:18 PM PDT by Bed_Zeppelin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Both Judaism and some members Islam practice circumcision for religious reasons. How will this jive with First Amendment rights?


23 posted on 05/18/2011 3:58:45 PM PDT by The Great RJ (1`1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
SF Circumcision Ban To Appear On November Ballot

Thanks for the tip.

25 posted on 05/18/2011 4:05:48 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Will this lead to back alley circumcisions?


26 posted on 05/18/2011 4:07:56 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

There are lot of potential draw backs to this law.


28 posted on 05/18/2011 4:30:04 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Outrageous! If they have the money to pay for this ballot measure than its proof these fools have way too much access to way too much money.

If this one passes, then they ought to try banning baptism next, since babies are too young to make a decision about that too. Same foolish logic.

If the US Government tried to impose a requirement like this on the State of California, the brain trust in Baghdad on the Bay would be howling so loud you would be able to hear them around the globe. This demonstrates how close to Stalinism Liberalism really is.


29 posted on 05/18/2011 4:31:52 PM PDT by Bean Counter (If Obama is the answer, how stupid was the question??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I’m guessing obama was circumcised and they threw away the wrong part!


31 posted on 05/18/2011 4:48:55 PM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I am Jewish and I was circumcised when I was eight days old. I don’t remember if it hurt, but I couldn’t walk for a year.


36 posted on 05/18/2011 5:05:26 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Note to Obama: The only time you actually are the smartest person in the room is when you are alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Lot of idiots live in that place.


38 posted on 05/18/2011 5:17:45 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson