Obama's DOJ is up to their necks in this refusing to release info, as usual.
1 posted on
05/18/2011 10:26:09 AM PDT by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: jazusamo
Can the other judges on the Supreme Court force her to recuse herself? Can anyone? Can a Republican majority Congress impeach her?
To: jazusamo
This evidence is very, very close, but no cigar, without a direct tie to Kagan’s keyboard. However, it certainly fills the bill for “reasonable question” enough to impose recusal. The AG holds the stinger and won’t let go.
3 posted on
05/18/2011 10:33:09 AM PDT by
RitaOK
To: jazusamo
0bama, Kagan, Holder, Geithner, and all the rest of them can do whatever they want, as long as everyone’s too gutless to stand up to them.
Which has already been demonstrated many times.
7 posted on
05/18/2011 10:40:17 AM PDT by
668 - Neighbor of the Beast
(America is in dire distress and nobody is lifting a finger except to strike the keyboard.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
8 posted on
05/18/2011 10:50:05 AM PDT by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: jazusamo
So?
Calypso Wireless is pursuing a case against an alleged bad actor who wants to appropriate for himself the company's invaluable key patent. The judge is alleged to be a buddy of the defendant's lawyer. Judge has refused to remove himself from the trial. Apparently, conflicts of interest are dismissed out of hand.
9 posted on
05/18/2011 10:52:18 AM PDT by
pabianice
To: jazusamo
Does this disqualify her from taking part in the SCOTUS decision on ObamaCare once it hits them?
12 posted on
05/18/2011 11:53:50 AM PDT by
cranked
To: jazusamo
Did someone mention Kagan?
13 posted on
05/18/2011 11:59:32 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: jazusamo
The woman is not qualified and obviously a hack for the left.
She should be removed for corruption.
17 posted on
05/18/2011 12:26:17 PM PDT by
dforest
To: jazusamo
20 posted on
05/18/2011 1:35:04 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: jazusamo
There is only the hive mentality...all other views are invalid, infidel, and must be crushed.
Ethics do not matter.
Debate does not matter.
Honesty does nto matter.
Democracy does not matter.
All that matters is the hive-view.
/demthink
22 posted on
05/18/2011 1:39:23 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: jazusamo
Repeat after me, America...Abe Fortas, Abe Fortas, Abe Fortas...
28 posted on
05/18/2011 3:07:47 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: jazusamo
30 posted on
05/18/2011 3:19:51 PM PDT by
hattend
(Obama is better than OJ... He found a killer while on the golf course.)
To: jazusamo
So, what are ya gonna do about it> Beyotch is crooked as the day is long.
32 posted on
05/18/2011 3:45:15 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
To: jazusamo
It would be funny if Obamacare lost a vote in the SCOTUS because Obama appointed a judge who has to recuse herself.
40 posted on
05/18/2011 5:14:12 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(What's with rubbing in all the Anti-Mitch Cream?)
To: jazusamo
This ho has no business being on the Supreme Court. The left is out destroy everything American. Including the SCOTUS.
44 posted on
05/18/2011 6:31:29 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
("...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,..")
To: jazusamo; justiceseeker93; ExTexasRedhead; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; JulieRNR21
At the very least, if ObamaCare reaches the Supreme Court, Kagan should be forced to recuse herself.
45 posted on
05/18/2011 7:13:25 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Muslims are a people of love, peace, and goodwill, and if you say that they aren't, they'll kill you)
To: jazusamo
The only reason SCOTUS matters is because the States just roll over and play dead. They do not have any obligation to enforce an unconsitutional law, and SCOTUS (part of the Federal government itself) was never intended to be the final word on what the Feds get to do to us.
That is one thing that roiled the South in the run up to the Civil War. Northern states were nullifying the Fugitive Slave Law that required individuals to hunt down fugitve slaves, whether they wanted to or not, under plenaly of fine and/or imprisonment. Dred Scott answered the controversy, and of course we know how the rest of it went.
46 posted on
05/18/2011 7:16:39 PM PDT by
dajeeps
To: jazusamo
50 posted on
05/18/2011 8:51:41 PM PDT by
CriticalJ
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
To: jazusamo
Those hoping the SC will stop this unconstitutional piece of garbage are *fools*. The fix is in, was from the get go. And we have people like Mitt Romney considered “front runners”? How do you like them apples?
The fascists got a great deal, temporarily giving up control of the House in exchange for railroading this monster through.
Obama appoints 2 more Justices and we had better be seriously prepared for crimes on the part of the federal government that have been thought impossible in this country. The right “crisis” and there will be an executive order suspending civil liberties.....indefinitely.
51 posted on
05/18/2011 9:25:54 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
To: jazusamo
Republicans pencil-whipped her approval and let her slide in with no resistance. Much was known of her lying. They chose not to bring it up. Remember in November 2012.
54 posted on
05/19/2011 4:28:57 AM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson