The BC is simple: Either Hawaii stands behind it (both the short and long form) or they don't. Document forensics is pointless. It's quite clear Obama was born in Hawaii. We have the contemporaneous birth announcements. We have the failure of Hawaii to alert the Bush DoJ in 2008 to Obama's fraud. We have statements by Hawaiian officials that label the notion he wasn't born there silly.
Now in the case of OBL's rubbing out, we don't have the State of Hawaii. But we do have Obama's account of what went down. If it's false in any significant way, there are plenty of military and CIA officers who would know and who would have the strong inclination, indeed the duty, to blow the whistle and blow up the Administration. So my guess is it's true.
What I'm wondering about is the fact the CIA had zeroed in on OBL's fancy hideout (built in 2005), almost nine months ago. You know the ISI had to be aware of the hideout and had to have noticed the CIA's interest in it. Yet, despite having tolerated his presence without ratting him out to the CIA (who supposedly found the compound by watching a courier they had learned of via waterboarding in rendition prisons in 2007) the Pakis failed to warn him in time to escape to his cave in Waziristan. There's a lot yet to be told.
Janice Okubo said that they can’t reveal ANYTHING that is on a BC, when I asked if she would report to law enforcement if she knew something was a very public forgery. IOW, she is saying that they CANNOT report a forgery, even to law enforcement. I don’t buy it for a minute; I believe it is misprision of felony if they fail to report known forgery. But that’s the excuse she’s giving. So that argument totally fails.
And the HDOH itself is breaking so many laws and rules it’s not even funny. They need to do CYA just as bad as Obama does, at this point. They are falsifying records on Obama’s behalf.
Fuddy said she sent two certified copies to Obama. Obama gave photocopies to reporters including 2 images of his alleged BC - one a copy with green security cross-hatches (of which I have not seen a copy so I don’t know if it had a seal on it or not), and one a copy on white paper, having no seal. You tell me: where did that white copy come from?
In addition, there is what claims to be a photo of Obama’s “green copy”. It shows no sign of a seal anywhere. Apparently our “vigilant” media didn’t even notice or think twice about the validating mark being missing on the documents they were shown.
The only place where any sign of a very faint, indistinct seal shows up is in the PDF that Obama posted, which was scanned in a format that specifically allows manipulation. So he disclosed TWO DIFFERENT VERSIONS of supposedly the same BC, and only the manipulable one has any sign of a seal on it.
And the media didn’t even notice. I have to say, I see Jake Tapper a whole different way now than before; I can barely stand to look at him now.
We were lied to about where the birth announcement images came from. Why did “Koa” and the Prius Chat poster lie instead of actually going to the Hawaii State Library and getting a copy from the Star-Bulletin microfilm as they claimed they did? They actually got their images from somebody at the Honolulu Advertiser office. Just like Michael Rivero at Whatreallyhappened.com got his images from somebody at the Advertiser office, which is the exact same one that “Koa” and the Prius Chat poster got. Every image we had before 2010 that was clear enough for the words to actually be read came from somebody at the Honolulu Advertiser, and the Honolulu Advertiser documentably manipulated the Advertiser announcement image over time.