“The fact that everybody in Germany could have smelled the burning flesh is proof that Auschwitz never happened. / That’s your logic, in a nutshell.”
No, that is your brand of insanity. Auschwitz had proof. Buildings. Graves. Dead people.
You have no proof, but you assume your fantasies are as real as Auschwitz. Then, if Obama produces a birth certificate, you assume it is a forgery - and such a bad one that you can prove it by downloading a digital image.
Then your birther buddies call me a traitor, and say my kids should spit on me, and that I’m paid by US Army Psyops to post on FreeRepublic - ignoring that I’ve been posting since 1998.
Nuts.
You said it was crazy to think that they would have posted a forgery that any fool could prove was a forgery. They would never do that, so that can’t be what they posted, you said.
Makes no difference that it’s exactly what they posted.
If you’re going to use evidence to decide whether Auschwitz happened, then please use evidence to decide whether a BC forgery happened.
Specifically you might explain how the kerning happened, if it was typed in 1961 with a manual typewriter.
Or where the “white copy” came from, which has no sign of a seal anywhere.
Or why the photo taken of the “green copy” that Obama let the media see has no signs of a seal anywhere. Or even better - why nobody in the media even noticed that fact or cared. Nice watchdogs they are, huh?
Or why they would have scanned the thing in such a way to allow manipulation of the record rather than in a form that would prove it was unmanipulated. Like they scanned the “white copy” - though it doesn’t have a seal on it anywhere. It is such a sensitive scan that it has print showing from something that was BEHIND the sheet being scanned, but didn’t manage to pick up any sign of a seal. How did that happen?
This stuff is evidence. This is what the debate should focus on. The evidence.
Mcauliffe?