Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US strike violates Pak sovereignty: Musharraf
CNN-IBN, India ^ | May 02, 2011

Posted on 05/02/2011 2:06:22 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

US strike violates Pak sovereignty: Musharraf

CNN-IBN

Posted on May 02, 2011 at 01:58pm IST

New Delhi: Former Pakistan president General (retired) Pervez Musharraf called the operation by US forces to kill al Qaeda leader and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad near Islamabad a violation of Pakistani sovereignty."America coming to our territory and taking action is a violation of our sovereignty. Handling and execution of the operation (by US forces) is not correct. The Pakistani government should have been kept in the loop," Musharraf told CNN-IBN in an exclusive interview."Foreign troops crossing the border into Pakistan will not be liked by the people of Pakistan.

US forces should not have crossed over into Pakistan," he said.Musharraf, who was the chief of Pakistani Army before he orchestrated a bloodless coup in 1999 and took over the government in Pakistan, said that Pakistan has also been incurring the wrath of terrorists and has been an ally in the 'war against terror'. He said that all the forces trying to neutralise terror group should trust each other.

"If there is a lack of trust, it is bad. We are fighting the same enemy. It is wrong strategically and the issue of lack of trust is very bad. There has to be trust between the two agencies fighting the same enemy," he replied when asked if US claims that Pakistan was not kept in the loop about the operation against bin Laden were true.

He rubbished speculations that some Pakistani authorities were helping bin Laden and they helped him during his stay in Abbottabad, which incidentally also has the Pakistan Military Academy.

"There is no possibility of any local administration collusion but there could be involvement of

(Excerpt) Read more at ibnlive.in.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: binladen; crushislam; cultureofcorruption; musharraf; obl; operationgeronimo; pakistan; pakitrash; pockystand; proislamist; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

now Islamic group should read no Islamic group.


21 posted on 05/02/2011 2:43:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

trust each other...trust each other? OBL was next-door neighbors with retired paki military and trust is what you say?

Tell you what, Musharraf, you tell your Paki buddies that if they don’t like us going after mass murderers they can always turn down the 1.5 billion a year we give ya’ll in aid and we’ll give it to India instead.

Trust, indeed.


22 posted on 05/02/2011 2:46:01 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobertClark

> Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has asked
> Afghan President Hamid Karzai to dump United States and
> instead align with China for help in striking a peace
> deal with Taliban and rebuilding the economy.

LOLOLOL!!!

PLEASE align yourselves with China, PLEASE!!!

You think the Americans are bad for a tiny operation to dust Bin Laden??

You think the Chinese are going to put up with the antics of throwbacks from the 7th century??

I can’t think of a better way to guarantee that the Taliban will be systematically destroyed than for Pak to kow-tow to China.

Go for it, boys, and we’ll pop some corn.


23 posted on 05/02/2011 2:49:41 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: globelamp
I noticed from that picture that it was very close to a hospital, within about two blocks.

He was reported to be suffering from kidney problems and needing dialysis so that would be a very good location providing both military and health care.

Unfortunately, the military protection didn't work out too well.

I imagine that Pakistan is extremely embarrassed about the U.S. staging the raid and getting away with it uninjured so close to their ‘West Point’ equivalent? military academy.

That's got to send a very pointed message that even when surrounded by hundreds if not thousands of military troops one still isn’t safe from even a simple ground assault let alone a missile attack.

I really wonder how the helicopters got in so far without being discovered or shot down. It was stated that we did lose one copter due to ‘mechanical problems’ and WE destroyed it for ‘security reasons’.

Those choppers aren't heavily reinforced or protected so it is really amazing that they could travel so far into country and not be shot down.

It's hard to determine how much cooperation we got from Pakistan but this makes them look really incompetent.

24 posted on 05/02/2011 2:59:21 AM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Shove it Musharref


25 posted on 05/02/2011 2:59:53 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
So does keeping Osama, Mushy.
26 posted on 05/02/2011 3:00:21 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think they’re stepping it up a few notches now don’t you?


27 posted on 05/02/2011 3:02:46 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Pakistan has always kow-towed to China. And the Chinese didn’t have any problems with dealing with the mass murderers in Sudan and Myanmar or even the Taliban in its earlier avatar in the 1990s.


28 posted on 05/02/2011 3:04:06 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dglang

The cadets took down one chopper though.


29 posted on 05/02/2011 3:04:36 AM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: globelamp

Of course it is a sham. Anyone who has studied Pakistan knows that the government is run by the military, and the military is basically a fraternal organization.

But the “civilian” government has to put up some pretense to simply continue existing. They have to continue to spoof the outside world that they have a “civilian” government, because they’re now a nuclear power. They’re probably made more of a nuclear power by their association with the PRC, who is giving them all manner of technology, civilian and military. This is another reason why our “free trade” policy with China is stupid, but I won’t go off on that rant here. Suffice to say that the PRC and the Paks are joined at the hip.

The “civilian” government of Pakistan is necessary, because without it, they appear as a problem that the west has to deal with. And since they have at least a few nukes, dealing with them would require a very big hammer.

They’re violent, two-faced thugs. They’re not stupid, however.


30 posted on 05/02/2011 3:05:02 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The ISI doesn’t answer all that well to the outside promises made by their civilian government. But that doesn’t mean that they’re “out of control.” In fact, they’re actually the ones in control. The ISI and the Army really run the country. The civilian government is a facade, and protests about our violation of their airspace and sovereignty are necessary to keep up this facade. That’s all I’m saying.


31 posted on 05/02/2011 3:09:55 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
New Delhi: Former Pakistan president General (retired) Pervez Musharraf called the operation by US forces to kill al Qaeda leader and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad near Islamabad a violation of Pakistani sovereignty."

Screw you a-hole - your country was harboring a global mass-muurderer.

Suck it up.

32 posted on 05/02/2011 3:11:33 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Exactly right. The Pak military is how people get ahead in Pakistan. If you can read and follow orders, and you want a pretty comfy middle-class existence in Pakistan, the military is about the only option.


33 posted on 05/02/2011 3:12:21 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“We are fighting the same enemy”?
NOt true Pervez, you and your kind are the enemy.


34 posted on 05/02/2011 3:17:23 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
As soon as I heard about Osama’s death, I said to my co-workers that the first thing Pakistan would say is that the raid was a violation of Pakistani sovereignty.

Sometimes, I hate being right so often.

35 posted on 05/02/2011 3:25:54 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: globelamp

The viewers reviews of “Osama bin Laden’s Hideout” are even a scream:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Abbottabad+pakistan+military+academy&aq=&sll=34.17084,73.233728&sspn=0.06377,0.072956&doflg=ptk&ie=UTF8&hq=pakistan+military+academy&hnear=Abbott%C4%81bad,+Abbottabad,+Khyber+Pakhtunkhwa,+Pakistan&t=h&ll=34.185039,73.235807&spn=0.017715,0.039268&z=15&iwloc=B

As they say in Bora-bora, payback’s a female infidel canine.


36 posted on 05/02/2011 3:33:11 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Take him out too!


37 posted on 05/02/2011 3:39:21 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why, yes. It was a violation of Pakistani sovereignty, a consideration which hampered Bush’s efforts to catch UBL, since at the time the US was allied with Pakistan. But, alas alak, those days are gone. So will Pakistan now declare war on the US because they killed UBL within their territory? Why not? War on two fronts, three, four? What’s the difference?


38 posted on 05/02/2011 3:43:10 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Well har de har har har, ain’t that a shame.


39 posted on 05/02/2011 3:54:43 AM PDT by Waco (From Seward to Sara)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Exactly. It’ll play with the 50% of the population which is illiterate.


40 posted on 05/02/2011 3:57:32 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson