Is it just me or has anyone figured out that the new head of DOH at Hawaii admits, directly in the letter posted at the White that this is a unique ‘computer-generated certified copy’?
See Ms. Fuddy’s (yes that is the real name) letter at the bottom of this link.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-correspondence.pdf
“I have the legal authority to approve the process by which copies of such records are made. Through that authority, in recognition of your status as President of the United States, I am making an exception to current departmental policy which is to issue a computer-generated certified copy.”
So yes...its computer generated and not a ‘scan’ of real document. Ms. Fuddy tells us that - very directly.
Anything found or not found can be explained since they openly claim a) they have the authority to change the process and b) they did and created a computer-generated POS image and declared it to be a ‘certified copy’.
It seems Ms. Fuddy was brought in to do what Palafox may have refused to do.....
Strong arm tactics being used?
Both 0bama and Mrs. Fuddy Duddy also said that there was an exception made for him, but we know of at least two people who have received long form BCs from Hawaii in the past few months!
Yes, something stinks in Hawaii!
YE-E-E-E-E-EEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!! This is what I have practically been screaming at anyone who will listen! Hawaii told us exactly what they did, right down to the certifying statement! And if you look at each layer independent of the others, you can almost figure out what is on the original document, and further, if you take what is available from the layers and add it in with research by Butter and H. Mike (?) The complete picture is there!!!! I wish, wish, wish I was smart enough to do all this, because I know the answers are there.
“X” truly DOES mark the spot!!!!!
You’re confused. Fuddy said the current departmental policy is to issue a computer-generated certified copy. (i.e. the short-form COLB) The exception she’s making is to issue a certified copy of the LFBC.
I think you are misreading the sentence. What she is saying is that NORMAL POLICY is to provide a ‘computer-generated certified copy’ - i.e., like the earlier short-form CertificaTION of Live Birth.
I am making an exception to current departmental policy which is to issue a computer-generated certified copy.”
Nice work. Now I wonder if we can find out what he did was illegal or not?
It sounds to me like she is saying that the current policy is to only issue computer-generated abstracts but she is allowing an exception in this case.