How do you know who was lying?
How did that academic advisor know about Barack Hussein Obama II being born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961 if BHO Sr was lying to people, claiming that Roy was his only child? Did an academic advisor have standing in 1961 to get a birth certificate so he could prove BHO’s claims wrong?
That’s the trouble with these documents. They’ve suddenly appeared as supposed proof of Obama’s Hawaii birth, but what we’ve apparently got is bureaucrats telling Sr they know more about his life than he does.
Reminds me of my father-in-law telling his daughter what she really meant to say and what she was really feeling, because she didn’t know near as much of what was going on in her head as he knew.
We’ve got non-eyewitness sources who would not necessarily have access to records telling BHO he’s a liar because he doesn’t claim BHO II, and that is considered absolute, convincing proof that BHO II was born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961? Seems to me that this shows that maybe those “facts” were being contested by somebody who was in a position to know.
How do you determine who was lying?
The supervisor of the Passport Office, Alex Galovich, submitted a “cable” that claimed that the retention period for passport applications was changed and millions of records were destroyed. The law required a paper trail for both the change in retention period AND for the actual destruction of the records. There was no legally-required paper trail. The official records showed no changes during that time period. Records that would supposedly have been destroyed weren’t. And the Passport Office claimed that a search of records from 1978 and later conclusively showed they had no records from 1965. The only “evidence” for the destruction of those records was this “cable”; all the other evidence called the cable a liar. How do you determine whether that cable was accurate, or a forgery?
The academic advisor was a foreign student advisor to whom Obama was required to report in order to get and file paperwork as indicated by his/her signature on INS documents. He had one FSA in Hawaii and one at Harvard. The FSA was directly involved in the filing of Obama’s INS paperwork.
No, I’m sure the FSA didn’t request a BC. I’m sure she took his word about it. When the FSA in Hawai found out Obama was married and had a child, she wrote to the INS about her concerns and asked them to do a thorough investigation into the marriage before granting Sr. an extension. So she obviously didn’t trust Sr. either. And neither did the FSA at Harvard.
There’s also a reference on p. 21 to “the wife in the Phillipines from whom he is separated is a USC “??
Pam Gellar has pointed out that this file is already being thrown as race-bait...that papa was run out of town for dating white women
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2011/04/1944130/was-barack-obama-sr-eased-out-harvard-and-america-dating-white-women