The CDC’s 1961 Natality Report uses 50% sampling and justifies it because the BC’s were numbered at the state DOH offices as they were received there.
That matches what Janice Okubo, Communications Director for the Hawaii DOH, says.
And the numbers for the BC’s late in the year, compared to the number of births reported to the CDC, leave precious little wiggle room for there to be blocks of numbers that never got used.
Substantiate your claim that they did it some other way than how the CDC, the HDOH Communications Director, and the actual data all say they did it.
We know Okubo has said things that suggest she doesn't understand her own system ~ so WHICH NUMBER IS SHE REFERRING TO.
Which number are you referring to.
One of those numbers is HIGHLY CONTROLLED and could only be entered once you had a completed form at the DOH office where it would be filed. The other number is not ony not highly controlled, it can be RESET at will by the person who has the numbering machine.