This is a question regarding the birth certificate that only computer literate people can help decipher.
It concerns the anomalous “X” found in the certifying statement. Freeper GregNH is one of the many who noticed it and asked why it appears. See this link for his observation:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2711155/posts?page=1406#1406
Freeper Brown Deer took the time to greatly enlarge the certifying statement in order to view the “X” anomaly more closely. That post appears here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2711155/posts?page=1426#1426
This is the question I am asking, is it possible to make the “X” appear intentionally from the Hawaii end prior to presenting the data to the WH? Why would they do that?
Here is my theory:
Hawaii intentionally changed the certification phrase to read “TXE records” to indicate that what they are certifying is a compilation of all the data points in their base for the records of Barack Hussein Obama. So any name changes BHO made to his record, or any other changes he made, would not be reflected, only the most recent information in any particular field would be considered valid and “original.”
I am wondering if it would be possible for them to do the following:
1. Assemble the data from all the data points into a central program.
2. Take a digital photo of the hand-stamped certifying statement.
3. Transfer the digital photo to a drawing program and change the “H” in “the” to an “X”.
4. Transfer the “X” certifying statement to the assembled data page.
5. Print out the data page.
6. Photocopy the page with the accompanying security paper.
7. Scan and provide in digital form to the WH along with one white copy.
.
If this is possible, then what Hawaii says they did is true and the certifying statement on the certificate validates this. Hawaii said:
“Original forms from the time of birth are used to produce computer-generated documents recognized as official birth certificates in the state of Hawaii.”
In order to fully understand this statement, you must read it in “Clintonesque” fashion:
—Notice the plural use of the word “form” — form(s)—
—Notice the use of the word FROM, consider it in the sense of a sale at a store with items FROM $7.99. There is more after that FROM.
—Now notice these words, “produce computer-generated documents”
Another words,
TXE records provided an “abstract” (translate this to mean compilation) of all the “original” FORM(S) (which dictates using the most recent amended information at any data point) —FROM— BHO’s time of birth [implied up until the present time] and put together in a digital form, ie. “computer-generated document.”
Freeper D-fendr confirmed the following in a response posts:
(1) TXE is real computer terminology that could possibly be used in an official capacity by Hawaii.
(2)D-fendr sees the “X” as clearly being an “X”, too, and not a blurred “H”.
But questions this aspect: “In my opinion, the PDF posted by the White House is a digital composite. It consists of the security background and picture elements only. It may, and likely does include a scan.” D-fendr further suggests in #169 that it would be helpful to have other long forms to compare to.
D-fendr posts found here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711307/posts?page=168#168
Freeper Danae, who also requested her birth certificate from Hawaii recently has agreed to provide it once again in various views to help with the unraveling of this possible theory. Here is her post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711307/posts?page=176#176
In conclusion: those of you who do understand the compiling and manipulation of data in computerized form, is what I am proposing at all possible? If so, how likely? And even if likely, worth the effort? Could this explain at all the reasons this document as it has been presented causes such a gut reaction of “fake”?
Thank you for taking time to consider this angle presented from an admitted computer dummy. I really don’t mind being “shot down.” Just would like to know the details of why this is not possible, if it is not possible, so I can learn from my own mistakes if I have made them. Thanks.