Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk
I don't know my history? lol, the guy on the left is our ally Chiang Kai-shek the leader of China until 1949.

So yeah, invading and nuking China in 1945 or 46 would have been betraying an ally. Dido Russia in the same time frame.

Personally, I'm much more concerned about the rise of Islam now, then I am about could have beens in 1945. But in no way could or should the US do as you suggest back then.

Now if you care offer suggestions on how to deal with Islam and/or the Narco terrorist state on our southern border I'll listen. Oh and you should drop all the personal insults too. It only belittles your arguments.

125 posted on 04/28/2011 12:58:12 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
1. I take it you think you have some reference to where you falsely claim that I suggested nuking our actual ally Chiang Kai Shek as opposed to killing (by whatever means necessary) Mao and Chou, which would have preserved our ally Chiang.

2. The slaughter of soviet leadership can only be viewed as a betrayal of an ally by thoise who so love their delusions of "peace" as to regard the likes of Stalin as an ally. He was an enemy of the United States in reality whatever the ostensible foolishness caused by FDR's diplomacy. Better that Stalin and a thousand soviet bureaucrats be pre-emptively assassinated than one American soldier die unnecessarily in Korea or Viet Nam. Instead, the "peace at any price" liberals and losertarians clasp the Stalins to their collective bosom and weep crocodile tears to preserve Uncle Joe and his morally repugnant and murderous system.

3. Both MacArthur and Patton and the remnants of the German and Japanese general staffs apparently believed the extinction of the soviet state as quite doable but what did they know compared to losertarian peace creeps?

4. When Cassius Clay/Mohammad Ali was heavyweight champion, his critics accused him of a lack of humility. His response was to say that humility was the quality of knowing your own strengths and weaknesses and being honest and candid as to both. He then pointed out that it was humility, so defined, that required him to call himself The Greatest. In a similar vein, the challenge of trying to figure out how to insult peace creep losertarians has a very high degree of difficulty given the reality of peeacecreepism and losertarianism.

5. Are we to believe that anyone capable of voting for Ron Paul for any office could possibly be concerned about the rise of Islam??? Slingshots won't stop them assuming that paleoPaulie or paleoanyone is willing to have the gummint fund slingshots.

6. I do not share the obsession of some here with Mexico which I regard as posing no threat whatever beyond a certain degree of criminality which our domestic thugs also practice. Galveston is closer to Mexico than rural NW Illinois is to Mexico. We are worried about hordes of Canadian illegals pouring over the Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan borders and polluting our culture by singing Allouetta or God Save the Queen. Why not call Paulie of Galveston. Maybe he could hold a lying press conference and talk out of both sides of his mouth on that issue too. Aren't most Paulistinian losertarians open borders enthusiasts???

7. For military recruits, we can hardly depend on Paultards. Maybe we can offer prompt citizenship to any straight young Mexican of good character, 18 years of age to 30, in good health who enlists in the US military and successfully completes six years or so of honorable service. That's one thing we can do about Mexico.

8. Remarkable: You defend Stalin and Mao and express horror lest we might have done them in in a timely fashion but you apparently think that it is a crime of some sort to be Mexican. Since the communist Institutional Revolutionary Party lost control of Mexico to Vincente Fox and his party and his successor, I don't really remember Mexico being a "Narco terrorist state on our southern border." We need to make up for 50 million innocents murdered by surgical abortion alone since 1973 and Mexico is a good source of socially conservative and hard-working ambitious folks from what we see here in the vicinity of Rockford. The Mexican "illegals" are here. They are not going back unless they want to any more than the Japanese-Americans, the Chinese Americans, other Latinos or my English, German, Scottish and (most certainly) Irish relatives and there is nothing you can do about it and nothing your Congressman will EVER do about it. Grow up and get over it.

9. As to Islam, it would violate the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment for any state to discriminate against them. The feds are not so limited. When we extract Hussein from the White House, we can get to work on Islam removal, even if paleoPaulie favors the mosque at Ground Zero in New York. If the states want to help the feds on this, we can look the other way for as long as necessary. The Fort Hood shootings prove that the military service option is not a wise one to extend to the Islamics. The military must be restored as a no fragging zone.

10. When I need your advice on how to argue, I will be sure to ask. Don't hold your breath waiting.

126 posted on 04/28/2011 1:48:03 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson