Posted on 04/27/2011 8:58:36 AM PDT by grundle
I don't consider myself to be a "birther," but I am not a fool either.
The document that Obama released today says that it is an "abstract" of the record on file.
In law, an "abstract" is defined as "a brief statement that contains the most important points of a long legal document or of several related legal papers."
So it's not the actual form.
Also, it's printed on modern computer paper.
And it's dated "April 25 2011."
The number is out of sequence as well.
Larry Sinclair's father!
CONSPIRACY and FAGGOTRY!
race of father? African?
I believe that the April 25, 2011 date is when it was photo copied.
Would not such an exercise settle the issue?
.
Anyone here born around 1961 know if that type of paper was used around that time?
Did you notice in box 5b how the M in P.M. in reduced yet the other M’s on the page are all equally sized to the surrounding font.
(9)I cannot imagine the British (in the 60’s) permitting the use of the word “African” to describe the race of white people born in Kenya, Africa.
Shouldn’t the occupation in 17a be listed as Student?
Where is Dan Rather????????!
OK, now where’s the Obama/Dunham marriage certificate?
not possible to get that from any government entity (public transparent thorough).
Does this mean that Obama and Michelle can go to the Royals Wedding now? /s
Note please the signature of the local registrar for Obama is different than that of the twins, who were sopposedly born in the same hospital within days of Obama. How can there be TWO local registrars? The local resitrar on Obama’s BC is one word Uklle?
The WH says it sent a letter last week to the HI DOH requesting the long form, or certificate of live birth vs. the previously released certification of live birth. If you request your own long form, the certification of its authenticity at the bottom would be dated the day the copy is issued.
And, your certificate of live birth (long form) would be on official paper with whatever watermark is used in that jurisdiction, It would also contain virtually the same language about its being ‘a true and correct reproduction or abstract of the original...’ That’s the standard in any jurisdiction in issuing a copy of one’s birth certificate.
Successful Rope-A-Dope by The Donald.
Thank you - I began to question the ‘watermark’ on the paper...you’re way ahead. Looks like computer generated wallpaper.
On to the college records..hell, how about a high school yearbook photo. Travel records to Pakistan? Passport? Selective Service registration?
I have done some research(legal books and online), and I have not been able to ID the phrase “certificate of live birth.” I have not found a source that uses it, they all use “birth certificate”; and, if you are requesting a record from a state agency, the request form may say “birth record.” I had never heard the term, “certificate of live birth” before the Kenyan made his ascent.
Why would they go through the trouble to issue an “abstract” on an old typewriter (or at least try to make it look that way)? They used computer paper which is modern but dropped the letters “u” and “n” in some words like a manual typewriter. Why would they try to fool us on the type but use modern computer paper? We must look pretty stupid to these people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.