no, there’s nothing fishy at all. Look at the dates the forms were prepared, not the dates of birth.
THEN imagine that you want to forge a birth certificate. How would you possibly know A. what serial number to use for a date that long ago, and B. that no one else would show up with the identical serial number and prove you were forging.
Then look at the Nordyke birth certificate and see that the typist made the identical capitalisation decisions as on the Obama certificate, on an identical typewriter, and tell me that the forgers were that careful.
It’s over. Let’s talk about spending cuts vs. tax hikes.
I tend to agree. The only problem is we have now opened the can of worms that will allow an anchor baby that waves the Mexican flag and can't speak English to become President. By not challenging the NBC portion of the BC, we are tacitly overriding the Constitution. We will, no doubt very soon be revisiting this with a baby with one parent not a citizen.
By concentrating of the location of birth, now to bring up the father's nationality will just be like turning the Titanic with a canoe oar. He will be easier to defeat by looking at what he is doing to the country than harping about a breech in Constitutional law. The breech in law will again haunt us later.
I agree. Although I think there is merit to questioning why he spent so much covering up almost EVERYTHING about his life, at the same time I think we just took a torpedo. This particular issue is done for. There isn’t enough there there to use the question of NBC to sink this guy. Too bad.
Still not convinced.
Obama and crew had three years to make up an elaborate forgery, and to hire the best forgers in the world.
He doesn’t speak like an American; he doesn’t act like an American; he doesn’t walk like an American.
(-> -> Insert Duck Analogy here...)
Line 7c on Obama’s says “Honolulu, Hawaii and the Nordyke says, “Honolulu, Ouhu. Why is that?