Posted on 04/23/2011 4:26:06 PM PDT by TommyDale
Snopes' Certification of Live Birth shows supposedly issued in August, 1961 but the Revision date is 11/01. What is REALLY interesting is the light blue time stamp that reveals the actual date of issuance as Jun 6 2007. See the picture for the highlighted area showing the time stamp from the back side where it bleeds through. Hold it up to a mirror and you can see the date!
(Excerpt) Read more at msgboard.snopes.com ...
Exactly. In 1961 it would have been Negro. Not African.
Of course they show as dots in that one. It’s a low resolution image.
Duh.
You sure got that right...:O) pc will screw you up all the time...
That’s the date the format of the document itself was revised not the date that Obama’s birth data was revised.
Hawaii laser prints the border, seal, and field headings on the green paper themselves. When they purchase the green security paper, it doesn’t come out of the box with their chosen border, seal, and field headings pre-printed for them by the paper manufacturer.
So when the DoH makes changes to any of those printed items, they change the Revision date at the bottom of the document to reflect when those changes were made.
It has been covered. For Vital Statistic reporting in 1961, the regulation stipulates the races cited below:
As it says again,
"Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian, and Part-Hawaiian (combined),and "other nonwhite." "
Assuming he was born here, why should he? From his point of view, he has already submitted the documents to prove his eligibility. Why does he have to prove it again just to satisfy those who don't support him anyway? Why not let our side obsess over this issue as we did in 2008 with HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS?
Pursue this issue if you must, but we need to concentrate on the issue most Americans care about, the economy. We lost in 2008 because we were busy screaming HUSSIEN-WRIGHT-AYERS while ignoring the economy, which we could have won on. Let's not make that mistake again.
All races live in Africa. The term in that era was NEGRO. Or Negroid. Not "African."
Snopes is funded by george soros. Nuf said. ( And so is factcheck )
It’s an image that you can clearly see that the Obama COLB seal on the right side of the picture does not say anything.
When was Alfred Onaka the state registar?
born June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York, NY (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Parents were
Frederick Christ Trump, born October 11, 1905 in Queens, NY, died June 1999 in Queens, NY
Mary Ann MacLeod, born May 10, 1912 in SCOTLAND, died August 7, 2000 in Queens, NY. Arrived in US October 5, 1935. Naturalized as a US Citizen March 10, 1942.
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Donald Trump is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Comrade Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.
For all we know, he was born in Moscow of students at Patrice Lumumba University (a real place) and raised as a mole by the KGB.
It was “Negro” in 1961. But again, this document was revised in November, 2001 and not even issued until June 6, 2007. I am merely pointing out the inconsistencies. I know it is a fake, and Snopes themselves were duped. Yet the media accepts this as fact.
Ok BuckeyeTexan, what talking point were you given for this fact?
Dam I’m convinced!!
I agree. This is a fake, but Snopes says it is legitimate.
The diversion continues.
Even if Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama had been birthed in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
The term in 1961 would have said “Negro”.
I don’t know, but the link works for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.