Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AAABEST
And it says “this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.”

The fact that Obama is moving about is prima facie evidence that he was born. What we want to know are the circumstances. And if you want something "prima facie," how about the fact that he's clearly trying to hide something about those circumstances?

16 posted on 04/21/2011 5:28:51 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham

Reposting my response on this issue the other day.

“Actually NO, she is not right. In your quote of the law it keeps talking about “the CERTIFICATE”. In other words that a certified copy of the “ORIGINAL” “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” is legally the same as the original. DUH. They aren’t going to allow you to have “the original birth certificate”. They give you a copy, and this law is saying that a copy is just as good. A COLB is NOT a “COPY” of the original.
Now Hawaii has just changed laws & procedures about birth certificates to be able to TRY to get around having to provide a copy of “the original”. It won’t work.”


46 posted on 04/21/2011 5:47:32 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson