Skip to comments.
NATO Says It Cannot Stop Shelling Of Libyan City
AP via Yahoo News ^
| 19 April 2011
| Karin Laub & Maggie Michael
Posted on 04/19/2011 11:03:36 AM PDT by edpc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
R2P fail.....to go along with all his others.
1
posted on
04/19/2011 11:03:44 AM PDT
by
edpc
To: edpc
It’s all over but the slinking away.
To: edpc
What a horribly sad joke...
To: edpc
Commander Obama is an idiot.
4
posted on
04/19/2011 11:07:15 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
hooray for War by Committee
5
posted on
04/19/2011 11:07:27 AM PDT
by
raygunfan
To: edpc
6
posted on
04/19/2011 11:08:59 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: edpc
And those boots on the ground Obama said would never be there, were announced today, as “Advisors”.
We live in the world of Orwell now, and I just cannot fathom why our supposedly unbiased media isn’t calling Obama out on this.
7
posted on
04/19/2011 11:09:18 AM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(2012 Slogan: "You'd Have To Be Insane, To Vote For Hussein!")
To: edpc
Kaddafi had nearly won the war. It would have been over weeks ago, if not for these jerks.
And with far fewer casualties.
And they already had oil deals with Kaddafi. Do they really think the Muslim Brotherhood will give them better deals?
I understand why Obama is in this—he loves Muslim terrorists. But I can’t imagine what Sarkozy and Cameron are smoking.
8
posted on
04/19/2011 11:11:29 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: edpc
Ragtags will be loading on get away boats in hours, hope they enjoy killing people in France.
To: edpc
Psst .....NATO is impotent. Sad to say, but true.
10
posted on
04/19/2011 11:14:34 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
To: edpc
NATO Says It Cannot Stop Shelling Of Libyan CityHave they tried surrender?
11
posted on
04/19/2011 11:15:17 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: edpc
What - counter-battery fire doesn’t work anymore?
12
posted on
04/19/2011 11:16:21 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: tcrlaf
I just cannot fathom why our supposedly unbiased media isnt calling Obama out on this.Well, fathom it. The news media's only purpose is to promote the goals of big government socialism. All else is dressing to help sell their product to the masses.
What I don't understand is how they have been so successful keeping alternative worldviews out of their newsrooms.
13
posted on
04/19/2011 11:17:28 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: edpc
Time to scrap NATO. It has long lived past it’s usefulness.................
14
posted on
04/19/2011 11:17:28 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
To: edpc
Gadhafi was chasing what he considered undesirables from Libya.
Then Obama recklessly thrust the US into an illegal war while sucking in allies France and Britain, started a massacre, created a civil war, stuck NATO in a hopeless situation and made it look weak and ineffective and slimes off to play golf.
15
posted on
04/19/2011 11:18:41 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(Whether they want to admit it or not, everyone knows Obama is hiding his bc.)
To: tcrlaf
And those boots on the ground Obama said would never be there, were announced today, as Advisors. Is that true? I haven't seen much news today...
Lyndon Baines Obama is on the frigging march...
16
posted on
04/19/2011 11:20:02 AM PDT
by
MortMan
(What disease did cured ham used to have?)
To: skeeter
“What I don’t understand is how they have been so successful keeping alternative worldviews out of their newsrooms.”
Not really that hard when you understand that:
1)Most big media types are themselves Unionized.
2) Most big-media newsrooms are over-run by radical gays. At some local outlets, you cannot even get hired if you AREN’T gay.
One article here a couple of years ago noted that 58% of the staffers at NBC-News New York were gay, lesbian, bi, or transgendered.
The US population is TWO percent.
You think those views are over-represented in today’s media?
17
posted on
04/19/2011 11:27:09 AM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(2012 Slogan: "You'd Have To Be Insane, To Vote For Hussein!")
To: skeeter
What I don't understand is how they have been so successful keeping alternative worldviews out of their newsrooms.
FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!!
18
posted on
04/19/2011 11:28:01 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: edpc
How in the hell does one have air superiority over the battlespace, and not have the ability to destroy artillery??
To: edpc
I just have one thing to say:
![](http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~tpilsch/AirOps/Images/ArcLight/B52D_ArcLightMission.jpg)
![](http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~tpilsch/AirOps/Images/ArcLight/ArcLight_impacting--400x263.jpg)
Buffs.
20
posted on
04/19/2011 11:32:37 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(0bamanomics: Trickle Up Poverty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson