Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Minus_The_Bear

No, no, no. I cannot say “no” emphatically enough.

The only part of this bill that mattered was the part that allowed legal residents or members of AZ’s House or Senate to challenge an eligibility decision in court. That is the very thing that would allow the transaction logs to be subpoenaed so that forgeries could be detected, and that would allow NBC to be defined in the courts.

This bill would do everything we need it to do. And it would make sure that a SOS could NOT make a decision based purely on politics. Brewer’s comment is the very reason why she should have SIGNED the bill.


81 posted on 04/18/2011 7:19:02 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

This didn’t make it out of committee last year, even though it had the votes. The Pubbie decided the State had enough “ridicule” over SB 1070.


86 posted on 04/18/2011 7:25:21 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

If that’s the case there are more than enough votes to overide her veto.


92 posted on 04/18/2011 7:33:49 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson