The reason she gave was to keep a SOS from being able to make a politically-motivated decision to keep somebody off the Presidential ballot. The trouble is, her veto ensures that the decision WILL be made by a SOS and NOT by a judge who is authorized to interpret the Constitution and who has access to the critical records.
IOW, her action makes no sense with what she said.
Very, very disappointing.
Posted by: Transnational
Apr 18, 05:32 AM
It appears to me that the legislation that is in process in Arizona will do the opposite of what various news reports have characterized the bill to accomplish. Of course, America is only his mothers country. Barrys alleged biological fathers country was Kenya. I recommend that people read the information about the bill that is available at the Arizona web address as follows:
[www.azleg.gov]
The current wording of that Arizona bill could be interpreted as making a child born to only one American parent a natural born United States citizen. Note the bills language as follows: A person who is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is a natural born United States citizen.
http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/42323/806394.html
The Bill, if you agree with the comment posted in comments at American Thinker article, appears to be faulty. More reason to veto it?