She says in her veto the bill puts it all in the hands of the one individual, the SOS. IOW I believe she is saying it gives too much power to the SOS who could address the issue with political intent if the SOS is so inclined.
We have to remember it’s not just this case of Obama that would be effected. A Soros Secretary of State project SOS could use the bill for political advantage.
She would approve the bill I think if they rewrite the language so the SOS is not the soul decision maker on the matter.
So we should have no Secretary of States and we should have no enforced Constitutional standards because Soros might a lefty elected as SoS?
Come on now.
This bill specifically made it so that any legal resident could challenge the SOS’s decision in court. This bill takes power AWAY from the SOS and puts it in the hands of the judiciary, who alone is authorized to interpret the Constitution in matters of both law and fact.
To veto this bill is a move to insure that a SOS CAN act as a political hack, unchecked by either the people or by the rule of law.