Seems like yesterday she was saying she hadn’t really looked at the bill, and today she’s saying she’s too embarrassed to sign it because it mentions the word “circumcision”.
Can a 50-year-old woman (or however old she is) be as stupid as a 7th-grade girl in heat? What kind of morons is she listening to anyway?
And her argument is as backwards as anything could be. This bill would add 3 more “gatekeepers” so she vetoed it because she thinks there shouldn’t just be one gatekeeper? I know 4-year-olds who can reason better than that.
Butter,
Not sure if you saw this previous thread from last week. See post #14 from that thread.
Brewer hints she may veto Arizona’s ‘birther’ bill
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2705586/posts
I think my big concern probably, just shooting a little bit from the hip, is the fact that I dont know if we regulate federal elections, she said.”