The only part that matters is whether the bill allows standing. And in AZ standing was particularly allowed for state legislators who have subpoena power, so (as I understand it, and hopefully somebody will correct me if I’m wrong) they can subpoena the transaction logs and other records necessary to determine whether the records have been manipulated or altered without a judge being able to limit their discovery.
The Arizona bill is a good bill. It covers the bases. The reason Brewer gave to veto it is because it does what she says should be done - it keeps a SOS from being able to single-handedly make an eligibility decision based on sheer politics.
Do you know if the Louisiana bill gives people legal standing to challenge eligibility? The AZ move to specifically allow state legislators to have standing is important also, if that ensures that a political-activist and/or bribed judge can’t keep discovery of the transaction logs from happening.
Right now we have no Constitutionally-functioning legislative, executive, or judicial branch, and a treasonous media. What we have to defend the Constitution with is you and me. Period. We the people are the last line of defense because all the infrastructure has become a criminal enterprise - and I do not say those words lightly. I mean every word of it, based on what I have seen and can document.