From 1780 Britanica
Native is defined as two Citizen parents.
Posted on 04/17/2011 7:32:49 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Thanks for the ping!
I somewhat agree.
However, I think for the record and to help wake folks up—it is worthwhile to continue to make an issue of it.
Just as you say—he could announce at noon etc. and nothing would change . . .
THE SAME IS TRUE in terms of working against voter fraud etc.
The globalist powers that be control ALL such things to the nth degree in MOST spheres and localities with some exceptions in a very localized small sphere way.
THE ONLY POWER ABLE TO COMBAT THEIR DEMONIZED CONTROL
IS
PRAYER—FASTING AND PRAYER.
SERIOUSLY.
Not that we should avoid doing other stuff besides . . . just saying . . . we need to put most of our efforts to what does the most good in behalf of our land and what shreds of freedoms we have left.
One really have to wonder WHY everybody, the three branches, the medias have been AWOL on this legit issue and derogatory name calling anyone who are questioning the CONSTITUTION's requirement. It's such a mystery, WHY???
“You want to molest those words..to mean..”we the aliens..give to our posterity”.”
No, you do. No one ever said an alien can be president. You lie when you say that.
One of the reasons we are in this mess is that, for the most part, Christians bought into the line, "Christians should not participate in politics," because politics are a dirty business.But politics became a dirty business because they were allowed to become dirty.
Jesus Himself said, concerning His followers, while they are not of the world, they are in the world. Which implied that Christians had/have a responsibility to influence for good. A responsibility they aboragated in the last decades.
From 1780 Britanica
Native is defined as two Citizen parents.
You are inccorrect:
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words "all children" are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as "all persons," and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.
LOL, what a great pic!
RE: Native is defined as two Citizen parents.
I did not read that definition in your photo.
It says in 1780 Britanica :
1) A Person (why does thes look like f ? ) born in a certain place
2) Which was the proper *residence* of his parents (tells us nothing about the parent’s citizenship, you can be a resident without being a citizen ).
3) Where he received his education.
So, Obama meets all the above criteria, what then ?
If the definition of NATURAL BORN requires :
1) Birth on American soil ( let’s grant that for now ), and
2) Two Citizen Parents ( his father’s status was doubtful ),
All the photo has proven is he is NATIVE BORN, not NATURAL BORN.
Well, I guess we had just better check education references as well. lol.
RE: Native is defined as two Citizen parents.
I did not read that definition in your photo.
It says in 1780 Britanica :
1) A Person born in a certain place 2) Which was the proper *residence* of his parents (tells us nothing about the parent’s citizenship, you can be a resident without being a citizen ).
3) Where he received his education.
So, Obama meets all the above criteria, what then ?
If the definition of NATURAL BORN requires :
1) Birth on American soil ( let’s grant that for now ), and
2) Two Citizen Parents ( his father’s status was doubtful ),
All the photo has proven is he is NATIVE BORN, not NATURAL BORN.
(BTW, why does the letter ‘s’ look like ‘f’ in their old print ?)
There have been plenty of cases you refuse to quote here in the US that define natural born as just that, a person naturally a citizen by the fact that they were born citizens with no further action was needed.
Again, you twist, and twist, and twist, but the definition of natural remains as it is.
Your reading comprehension is horrible. Are you really that stupid or just desperate to try to redefine natural?
That's the way they wrote back then, I don't know the exacr reason why but I have seen it in other publications.
2) Which was the proper *residence* of his parents (tells us nothing about the parent’s citizenship, you can be a resident without being a citizen ).
To me that would mean parents who reside legally.
So, Obama meets all the above criteria, what then ?
But he doesn't, note the plural parents
Actually, I posted that to rebut the poster who was stating that Native Born was made up and didn't exist.
Grow up kid.
Your comprehension skills are what is lacking, not mine.
I greatly agree, of course.
Thx.
I watched the whole video. Very interesting.
Heeheee, snort and bada bing!....ya knocked that one out of the park FRiend....can’t wait to see the response.
You rock!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.