I think we need to continue what we’re doing. And Palin said it best yesterday when she argued against the mediocrity of the so-called TP reps in DC.
I don’t believe a passive-aggressive tactic will save the Country. It’ll require industrious activism, and an industrious economy. Entitlements, and self-serving expectations need to be replaced with hard work, pride, and the simple desire to save the wonderful Country for our children if not for ourselves. Perhaps we’re saying the same thing differently.
I vote for aggressive-aggressive. And yes, there was an element of ‘knee-jerk’ in my initial comment.
As I’ve said already... I used “going galt” merely as an allusion... A sort of metaphor about having reached the point of taking action... And to actively recruit like minded to accomplish durable national change...
“Entitlements, and self-serving expectations need to be replaced with hard work, pride, and the simple desire to save the wonderful Country for our children if not for ourselves. Perhaps we’re saying the same thing differently.”
At a county convention yesterday with Newt speaking. He seems to think the country can be turned around by asking welfare junkies if they would rather have a paycheck or a foodstamp. I think 48% of the country would answer foodstamp. They are simply not interested in having to actually work for food.