Posted on 04/16/2011 8:57:04 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Look how Chump operates. Caught red-handed now with his vicious attacks on George Bush, who most conservatives had issues with, he now says but for Bush there would have likely been no Obama. That may well be true. I have been a harsh critic of Bush's spending, including in my book. But Chump was calling Bush EVIL and demanded his IMPEACHMENT because of the Iraq war and in the middle of that war. He said Bush lied to get us into Iraq. His comments were vile and outrageous, not unlike the America-hating leftists who sought to undermine are armed forces there. Now he wants us to believe that his criticism of Bush was because Bush's poor record set the stage for Obama? Chump attacked Bush over Iraq because if you were a big-mouth, attention-seeking liberal, it was the thing to do. He had no altruistic or principled conservative motive for doing so at the time and expressed none.
As recently as last year, while conservatives and Tea Party activists were organizing and rallying against Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their radical agenda, Chump was helping to fund some our opponents. He contributed to left-wing, Tea Party-hating menaces like Chuck Schumer, Anthony Weiner, and Harry Reid. What about his contributions to Charlie Crist, while Crist was running against Marco Rubio? Did he donate to any of the Tea Party candidates? Did he contribute to the Tea Party movement in any way, with time or money, before today? Why not?
Chump also praised Nancy Pelosi. He thought she was great. I played the audio. I guess he was just mistaken, again. He supported universal health care, but not any more, of course. He supported abortion and gay marriage, but that was then, this is now. He supported John Kerry for president in 2004, but that's because Bush was so evil. He leaned on government officials to use eminent domain against a little old lady whose home happened to be in the way of a parking lot he wanted to build for one of his casinos in Atlantic City, but he has always been for private property rights.
So now Chump rails against China and demands Obama's birth certificate and we are supposed to swoon over the man. But when asked about the Ryan budget, he turns stupid again -- he says Ryan should not take the lead on this, we need a bipartisan consensus to move forward? And with whom do we build this bipartisan consensus? Reid? Obama? Is Chump really this dumb, or is he, once again, trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing?
Chump is a phony and dissembling. He called a hastily organized press event this morning because I, and others, are on to him.
TRENDING: Trump lashes out at George W. Bush and Obama
Today he is speaking at a local Tea Party rally. And why? Because now he wants our support, not because he supports us or our principles, or ever did. Chump is about Chump. And he thinks we're too stupid to notice. Are we?
They truly believe that if Obama is declared ineligible, everything he has signed will be automatically null and void and reversed and everyone he has appointed will magically disappear and every decision they've made will be undone. Poof! Just like that. It's magic.
Actually, it's pure delusion. They're pulling FR and conservatism down the rabbit hole with them.
That didn’t happen. Obama’s first Executive Order did not seal his records. That’s a birther delusion. See my FR homepage for the truth on that one. Wake up.
What, the Donald is not paying attention to the lofty pronouncements of some radio shouter?
Excellent point, Wm.
I am a Levin fan but this time his rant was a little over the top.
Nothing personal but you sound like a student which is fine o was one at Ole Miss in the 7th decade of last century
I’m speaking of the dearth of knowledge and experience on this forum of folks who have boots on the ground education of managing companies...doing with banks...taxes....politicians...and all it
Takes to run multi million commerce entities with your own money and blood and guts at risk
Very little of that here..but quite a bit of class envy not u but I see it
Your moniker does not always stand up btw...at times faith is anything but reason
Im ambivalent on Trump ...... loveLevin...but im.gonna stay outta Marks car on this one
Only candidate I loathe so far Romney and Shuck
I do not support any third party run except by a progressive
Time will...Trump decided to use this in his testing the waters time or he just got interested
I ve never been a bonafide birther but I do have questions on that and much of his documented post which its mostly sealed
Time will...Trump decided to use this in his testing the waters time or he just got interested
I ve never been a bonafide birther but I do have questions on that and much of his documented post which its mostly sealed
That’s because, to some, the “birther” issue is the only thing that matters.
That's true. Levin has what I think is basically an ego problem and it takes him into some unattractive behavior at times, all his obsessions about who said what first, who might be repeating what he said, and the "backbenchers" and all the people he thinks copy him.
And I feel sure I remember him being complimentary of Trump when Trump first starting speaking out a few weeks back, and then Levin would complain because Trump wouldn't come on his program. But this Levin explosion about Trump this week was all out-of-proportion, and is being driven by some sort of psychological maladjustment.
Levin is great on many subjects, but he has these obsessions that often lead him into some bizarre overreactions.
The truth is that Donald is NO Conservative. Feel free to throw away Conservatism for your one, very short thrill.
Hey BS, I am trying to save the country first...conservatism is second.
“Conservatives know a conservative when we see and hear one.
Trump is NO conservative, more like a Ross Perot with a bad
comb-over.”
Thank you. Many people here are so desperate for a candidate with cahones they’ll settle for this self-aggrandizing guy with no real principles. He’ll say and do whatever he needs to for himself and he’s fooling many people. Levin exposed him perfectly on his Friday show that you can hear at marklevinshow.com. Everyone should listen!
What is Levins vision of “how it oughta be”?
Read his excellent book, “Liberty and Tyranny.”
Besides the serious stuff Mark Levin does, he also is an entertainer. I for one am glad to have him sharing his knowledge over the airwaves -- as opposed to being sequestered with only a hand full of law students somewhere in academia.
If Donald Trump is serious about the Presidency he will go on Mark's show. I'm not sure what that discourse will sound like, but I'm pretty sure neither one of them will cry.
Dittos but Trump is plenty conservative. For business reasons he has kept his “inner conservative” suppressed for years. He has donated to hack Democrats like Reid, Schumer, Hillary for business reasons. You want to build something or expand a gambling operation you have to flatter and pay off the Democrat mafia. Donald is not a theoretician. He is a businessman who also has to protect his co-investors in a project. And some of those co-investors are lib democrats.
Now we are seeing the real Donald Trump. Plus he got older. He got more serious. He got more conservative. He got more disgusted by this punk Obama who inhabits the White House. Trump knows he can do 100x better than this schmuck.
“Mark Levin is smart and saucy. I let him do some of my thinking for me. I trust him that much.”
Me too. He is totally honest and the smartest guy out there. I trust him implicitly. I worry about his health (that cough). When we lose him we’ve lost a great thinker and the most articulate pundit out there and warrior for the Consitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.