Posted on 04/16/2011 8:57:04 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Look how Chump operates. Caught red-handed now with his vicious attacks on George Bush, who most conservatives had issues with, he now says but for Bush there would have likely been no Obama. That may well be true. I have been a harsh critic of Bush's spending, including in my book. But Chump was calling Bush EVIL and demanded his IMPEACHMENT because of the Iraq war and in the middle of that war. He said Bush lied to get us into Iraq. His comments were vile and outrageous, not unlike the America-hating leftists who sought to undermine are armed forces there. Now he wants us to believe that his criticism of Bush was because Bush's poor record set the stage for Obama? Chump attacked Bush over Iraq because if you were a big-mouth, attention-seeking liberal, it was the thing to do. He had no altruistic or principled conservative motive for doing so at the time and expressed none.
As recently as last year, while conservatives and Tea Party activists were organizing and rallying against Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their radical agenda, Chump was helping to fund some our opponents. He contributed to left-wing, Tea Party-hating menaces like Chuck Schumer, Anthony Weiner, and Harry Reid. What about his contributions to Charlie Crist, while Crist was running against Marco Rubio? Did he donate to any of the Tea Party candidates? Did he contribute to the Tea Party movement in any way, with time or money, before today? Why not?
Chump also praised Nancy Pelosi. He thought she was great. I played the audio. I guess he was just mistaken, again. He supported universal health care, but not any more, of course. He supported abortion and gay marriage, but that was then, this is now. He supported John Kerry for president in 2004, but that's because Bush was so evil. He leaned on government officials to use eminent domain against a little old lady whose home happened to be in the way of a parking lot he wanted to build for one of his casinos in Atlantic City, but he has always been for private property rights.
So now Chump rails against China and demands Obama's birth certificate and we are supposed to swoon over the man. But when asked about the Ryan budget, he turns stupid again -- he says Ryan should not take the lead on this, we need a bipartisan consensus to move forward? And with whom do we build this bipartisan consensus? Reid? Obama? Is Chump really this dumb, or is he, once again, trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing?
Chump is a phony and dissembling. He called a hastily organized press event this morning because I, and others, are on to him.
TRENDING: Trump lashes out at George W. Bush and Obama
Today he is speaking at a local Tea Party rally. And why? Because now he wants our support, not because he supports us or our principles, or ever did. Chump is about Chump. And he thinks we're too stupid to notice. Are we?
This forum has few businessmen and way too many populist about rich folks
FR however great has always been largely young single men, cat ladies, women who work or stay home, and retired men
That is 90 percent of our demographic
When I meet someone here knows business ins and outs I recognize it right away
Look deeper.
What if you’re being taken for a ride by a professional salesman?
Deceptiveness is the greatest weapon of the Marxists—don’t forget it!.
I encourage Dennis to keep attacking. Go Dennis, Go!
Exactly.
And a constitutionalist like mark levin doesn’t understand that we have been waiting a d dying for someone with dry enough panties to point out to the American people the utter lies about our president’s past. We needed a Donald Trump. Everyone else said it wasn’t an issue.
No one said, why do we believe him at his word, when the little league doesn’t believe us that our sons are 10, the liquor store won’t take our word that we are 21, and we can’t get a USA passport with our cosco ID.
There is so much circumstantial evidence that his story is phony, that state and national officials have broken laws for him, including nancy Pelosi, and no one, not rush nor levin, touched this issue. Go Donald!
So Trump’s a Marxist? Gotta source for that?
I think you need to delete the 'Cutter' part of your screen name. It would leave that part of your name that is more appropriate for your hysterics.
BTW, watch your language around here.
But there’s a difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics.
Trump’s skills in microeconomics are driven by the same devotion to his own personal gain that pushes back against the macroeconomic principles of liberty established by our Constitution.
In other words, Trump will step on anyone, and trample our Constitution, if it means he can get ahead.
Trump is a professional salesman—this means he knows how to disguise his selfish motives.
Maybe you out to remove the ia and Ridgerunner then put ‘Political’ in front of Virgin.
Why doesn’t everyone just chill out a bit over Trump right now?
He’s battering Black Barry and getting in his head. I don’t care if Trump is not a true blue conservative. There’s lots of time to decide who the GOP nominee is. Trump is just the flavor of the month. Let this little soap opera play out for awhile and enjoy it.
But for now Trump is calling Obama out, and Levin is calling Trump out. I think eventually Trump will go on Mark's show.
The one question I'd like answered is when did Trump have the epiphany on the birth certificate?
After all, this guy's been the President for a while now.
What is it that cheating husbands always say when caught with a backstreet tramp? “If you’d treated me right I wouldn’t have looked elsewhere.”
Well, Mr. Levin, if conservative luminaries like yourself had asked the obvious questions and demanded clarity on the issue of 0bama’s credentials, no conservative heads would be turned by Donald Trump.
But you didn’t step up.
Nah. That's just his style. More likely - Trump knows TGO would nail him to the wall.
“I’m guessing that if Trump would have went on Levins show Marks tone would be a little different. Instead, he’s running around parroting Karl Rove.”
Exactly the way I look at it is we need a fighter to tear out that slimeball that is rooted in the whitehouse,All I hear from these detractors is PAP ,so far only Trump has put it on the line and in the press!
Not necessarily an ideological marxist.
But definitely a billionaire who supports the status quo ruling class, which puts him on the other side—against constitutional conservatism.
The ruling class not only requires big government, it actively schemes for bigger and bigger government.
This, and the fact that cronyism defines big business and big government, explains why Trump supports government run universal healthcare and why he’s a Hillary man.
Correct.
The failure of the GOP to grow a sack is why Trump has emerged.
“He’s for Donald “The Beauty of Me” Trump. False flag all the way.”
My sentiments, exactly!!
Yes, he’s attacking Obama, but there’s just something really fishy about this whole thing.
If mark levin cared about our constitution, and commies and Arabs running a manchurian candidate for president in our beloved country, he might have ever mentioned it. Especially before the election where these lies were already being discovered here on FR. And then the stealth candidate won. Never a mention of him being ineligible.
Was mark afraid to be called a racist? If so, he’s a coward.
Was mark threatened by his bosses, like so many other media people? If so, he decided his livelihood was more important than our country, fair enough, but admit it at this point. Admit
it that you were bought.
Or did mark never think this was important? In which case only one of the two of us actually reveres the constitution. And it ain’t mark.
Great. Make that the center piece of your campaign. Completely ignore the FACT that the economy is on the verge of collapsing.
It's something kids read in doctors' waiting rooms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.